2010
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.579888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underestimation of Cognitive Impairment by Mini-Mental State Examination Versus the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke

Abstract: Background and Purpose-The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is insensitive to mild cognitive impairment and executive function. The more recently developed Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), an alternative, brief 30-point global cognitive screen, might pick up more cognitive abnormalities in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Methods-In a population-based study (Oxford Vascular Study) of transient ischemic attack and stroke, the MMSE and MoCA were administered to consecutive patients at 6-month or 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

19
321
3
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
19
321
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…With this cutoff point, the MoCA showed good sensitivity (77%), excellent specificity (97%) and PPV (96%), and good NPV (81%) and classification accuracy (87%). With an optimal cutoff point of below 26 points, the MMSE had consistently lower respective values, namely in sensitivity (62%) and classificatory accuracy (78%); this suggests that the MMSE is not a good option as cognitive screening instrument for VaD, as some authors have claimed (Hachinski et al, 2006;Moorhouse & Rockwood, 2008;Pendlebury et al, 2010;Román, 2003). The main reasons for the MoCA's higher results at this level were the inclusion of the executive function assessment and the consideration of more complex tasks to measure short-term memory, language, attention, concentration, working memory, and visuospatial skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this cutoff point, the MoCA showed good sensitivity (77%), excellent specificity (97%) and PPV (96%), and good NPV (81%) and classification accuracy (87%). With an optimal cutoff point of below 26 points, the MMSE had consistently lower respective values, namely in sensitivity (62%) and classificatory accuracy (78%); this suggests that the MMSE is not a good option as cognitive screening instrument for VaD, as some authors have claimed (Hachinski et al, 2006;Moorhouse & Rockwood, 2008;Pendlebury et al, 2010;Román, 2003). The main reasons for the MoCA's higher results at this level were the inclusion of the executive function assessment and the consideration of more complex tasks to measure short-term memory, language, attention, concentration, working memory, and visuospatial skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean MoCA of 25.86 ± 2.92 in our sample was similar to a smaller sample of individuals with MS [27], 26.02± 2.30 and is in the same range as other neurologic disorders associated with mild cognitive impairment including REM Sleep Behavior Disorder [34] (n=38, 24.34 ± 3.50), or early Parkinson's disease [7] (n=100, 24.9 ±3.1), but is considerably higher than individuals with brain metastasis [36](n=40, 20.53 ± -5.15), cerebral small vessel disease [37] (n=40, 19.2 ± 4.2), Huntington's disease [9](n=53, 21 ±4.4) or Alzheimer's disease [3](n=321,13.0 4 ±6.05) [4,[7][8][9]27,[36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients usually score normally on the MMSE but fall below normal range on the MoCA [3,[6][7][8][9].An extensive list of diseases for which the MoCA has been used as an assessment tool can be found on the MoCA website, www.mocatest.org [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cognitive assessments have relied on dementia diagnoses or have used screening tools, such as the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), 21,23,24 or the MiniMental Status Exam (MMSE), 8,10,25 which are relatively insensitive to early impairment. [26][27][28] Clinicians would benefit from understanding whether early stages of impairment are associated with altered social relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%