2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50403.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underestimation of Disability in Community‐Living Older Persons

Abstract: The occurrence of disability is substantially underestimated by longitudinal studies with long assessment intervals. More frequent assessments of functional status could lead to an improved understanding of the course and overall burden of disability in community-living older persons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
282
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
282
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the evaluation of those with cognitive impairment, the primary caregiver provided information on weight loss, level of physical activity, exhaustion, socio-demographic characteristics, medical conditions and functional aspects 27 . The use of the primary caregiver as the respondent was based on the difficulty elderly individuals with cognitive impairment have remembering facts and properly evaluating their physical and functional capacities, which compromises the reliability and accuracy of the information 27 . Individuals without cognitive impairment (according to the screening process) answered the questions themselves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the evaluation of those with cognitive impairment, the primary caregiver provided information on weight loss, level of physical activity, exhaustion, socio-demographic characteristics, medical conditions and functional aspects 27 . The use of the primary caregiver as the respondent was based on the difficulty elderly individuals with cognitive impairment have remembering facts and properly evaluating their physical and functional capacities, which compromises the reliability and accuracy of the information 27 . Individuals without cognitive impairment (according to the screening process) answered the questions themselves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Potential participants were identified from a large health plan in greater New Haven, Connecticut. Exclusion criteria, present in 8 individuals, included considerable cognitive impairment with no available proxy, 31 plans to move out of the area, inability to speak English, or terminal illness. Only 4.6% of persons contacted declined screening, and 75.2% of those eligible agreed to participate and were enrolled from March 1998 to October 1999.…”
Section: Parent Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for each of the 4 basic activities, 5 instrumental activities (shopping, doing housework, preparing meals, taking medications, and managing finances), and 3 mobility activities (walking one-fourth of a mile, climbing a flight of stairs, and lifting/carrying 10 pounds). 29,31,35 For these 12 activities, disability was operationalized as the need for personal assistance (yes/no). Participants were also asked about a fourth mobility activity, "Have you driven a car during the past month?"…”
Section: Assessment Of Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional status was measured by assessing the degree of assistance required in 7 instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)-telephone use, shopping for groceries, using transportation, meal preparation, housework, taking medications, and handling finances-and in 4 basic activities of daily living (ADL)-bathing, dressing, ambulating, and transferring from a chair. 12,13 Each item on the 7-item IADL scale is rated from 0 to 2 and each item on the 4-item ADL scale ranges is rated from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating higher functional status. IADL impairment was defined as needing assistance in any of the 7 IADLs, and ADL impairment was defined as needing assistance in any of the 4 ADLs.…”
Section: Standard Protocol Approvals Registrations and Patient Consmentioning
confidence: 99%