Undergraduate education of trauma and orthopaedic surgery in the UK

Abstract

Aims Evidence exists of a consistent decline in the value and time that medical schools place upon their undergraduate orthopaedic placements. This limited exposure to trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) during medical school will be the only experience in the speciality for the majority of doctors. This review aims to provide an overview of undergraduate orthopaedic training in the UK. Methods This review summarizes the relevant literature from the last 20 years in the UK. Articles were selected from database searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, Cochrane, and Web of Science. A total of 16 papers met the inclusion criteria. Results The length of exposure to T&O is declining; the mean total placement duration of two to three weeks is significantly less than the four- to six-week minimum advised by most relevant sources. The main teaching methods described in the literature included didactic lectures, bedside teaching, and small group case-based discussions. Students preferred interactive, blended learning teaching styles over didactic methods. This improvement in satisfaction was reflected in improvements in student assessment scores. However, studies failed to assess competencies in clinical skills and examinations, which is consistent with the opinions of UK foundation year doctors, approximately 40% of whom report a “poor” understanding of orthopaedics. Furthermore, the majority of UK doctors are not exposed to orthopaedics at the postgraduate level, which only serves to amplify the disparity between junior and generalist knowledge, and the standards expected by senior colleagues and professional bodies. Conclusion There is a deficit in undergraduate orthopaedic training within the UK which has only worsened in the last 20 years, leaving medical students and foundation doctors with a potentially significant lack of orthopaedic knowledge. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):549–556.

A systematic review of DDH screening practices in the UK

“…The included studies highlighted the variability in screening practice throughout the UK, with a variety of reported clinical and ultrasound screening methods. All papers reported on selective screening, except for Westacott et al [15], whose study compared universal with selective screening.…”

Undergraduate teaching of surgical skills in the UK: systematic review

“…However, these day-long one-off, occasionally annual events 12–16 were only available to a small number of students and rely on the willingness of proactive students to give up their time outside of the core curriculum. Furthermore, there were no studies that demonstrated a sustained improvement in surgical skills at follow-up, which has been shown to be an important marker of educational efficacy 32 , 33 . Clearly, this is not an appropriate way to address the deficit as it only benefits a small number of students and has not demonstrated long-term improvement.…”

Why include Case-based Learning in the medical curriculum? – A review

“…Several schools have attempted to bridge this gap using CBLs, in post-graduate and undergraduate training, and have found them effective. This is true for other serious but less common conditions where a fair amount of competency is expected (Burke et al, 2023;Chen et al, 2023;Poacher et al, 2022).…”