2009
DOI: 10.5860/crl.70.4.336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undergraduate Perceptions of Information Literacy: Defining, Attaining, and Self-Assessing Skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This group also assumed that everyone has these skills, partially as a result of growing up with computers, and that information seeking skills can be self-taught. They reported having very little information literacy training and the term itself did not resonate with them (Gross & Latham, 2009). Clearly, there is work to be done in order to help many students develop these important skills.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group also assumed that everyone has these skills, partially as a result of growing up with computers, and that information seeking skills can be self-taught. They reported having very little information literacy training and the term itself did not resonate with them (Gross & Latham, 2009). Clearly, there is work to be done in order to help many students develop these important skills.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Likewise, Melissa Gross and Don Latham interviewed and tested freshmen at Johns Hopkins. 17 In contrast, Alison Head and Michael Eisenberg did not look at freshmen, but interviewed sophomores, juniors, and seniors across multiple college and university campuses to look at how students conduct research and evaluate information. 18 The studies that have compared research processes of freshmen and seniors did not use ethnographic approaches.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies have employed Internet usage logs (Judd & Kennedy, 2010), log analysis (Broder, 2002), scripts read in person to participants (Cockrell, 2002), long interviews (H. Lee, 2008), discussion groups (Head & Isenberg, 2009), semistructured interviews followed by information literacy tests (Gross & Latham, 2009), diaries (J. Lee et al, 2012), and have even used online tracking (Morae) software while videotaping participants (Holman,), etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%