2014
DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2014.897660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undergraduate Students’ Knowledge of Algebra: Evaluating the Impact of Computer-based and Traditional Learning Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have sought to evaluate the impact of automated systems quantitatively by analyzing examination grades, cost effectiveness, and passing rates (e.g., Callahan 2016;Jonsdottir, Bjornsdottir, and Stefansson 2017;Kodippili and Senaratne 2008;Potocka 2010). Krupa, Webel, and McManus (2015) compared the impact of computer-based (CB) and face-to-face (F2F) instruction in an intermediate college algebra course. They used a quasi-experimental match design with the sample consisting of three levels of participants enrolled in the course.…”
Section: Previous Research Concerning Online Environments In Universimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have sought to evaluate the impact of automated systems quantitatively by analyzing examination grades, cost effectiveness, and passing rates (e.g., Callahan 2016;Jonsdottir, Bjornsdottir, and Stefansson 2017;Kodippili and Senaratne 2008;Potocka 2010). Krupa, Webel, and McManus (2015) compared the impact of computer-based (CB) and face-to-face (F2F) instruction in an intermediate college algebra course. They used a quasi-experimental match design with the sample consisting of three levels of participants enrolled in the course.…”
Section: Previous Research Concerning Online Environments In Universimentioning
confidence: 99%