2019
DOI: 10.1002/pon.5276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undergraduate training in breaking bad news: A continuation study exploring the patient perspective

Abstract: Objective: This paper reports on the continuation of an initial study that demonstrated the effectiveness, as rated by experts, of an undergraduate training in breaking bad news (BBN) using simulated patient (SP) and individual feedback. The current study aimed to further explore whether such an individualized training approach also has positive effects from the perspective of the patient, using the analogue patient (AP) methodology. Methods:A subsample of 180 videotaped interviews with SPs were selected from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At our University, communication teaching is fully implemented with theoretical and practical courses throughout the medical curriculum. The present study focuses on our undergraduate BBN training consisting of a 45-min lecture and a 20-min videotaped training with a simulated patient (SP) for each student, followed by an individual 1-hour supervision with a faculty tutor (described elsewhere [8][9][10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At our University, communication teaching is fully implemented with theoretical and practical courses throughout the medical curriculum. The present study focuses on our undergraduate BBN training consisting of a 45-min lecture and a 20-min videotaped training with a simulated patient (SP) for each student, followed by an individual 1-hour supervision with a faculty tutor (described elsewhere [8][9][10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis including 17 articles on interventions involving medical students, residents, and/or physicians demonstrated large improvement in the participants' performance in the OSCE and moderate improvement in selfconfidence 15 . The authors suggested further studies to evaluate the effects of interventions in clinical practice with real patients, which has also been highlighted by other authors [16][17][18][19][20] . One outcome measure should be the patients' perception on how they received BN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In order to prepare medical students and physicians for this task, the teaching has combined theory and practice 5 , generally based on frameworks that systematize the key steps of BN delivery [6][7][8] . Studies on the effects of interventions have included outcome measures such as the participants' subjective aspects (satisfaction, self-confidence, and comfort), 9 knowledge, performance in Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) rated by observers, standardized patients [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and/or analogue patients, 17 as well as performance in recorded consultations with real patients in relation to the patients' distress, satisfaction with the consultation, and trust in the physician 18 . Nevertheless, the most effective way to teach and learn utilizing simulated patients in medical education is still unknown 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, communication training courses with simulated patients are conducted from the second to the fifth curriculum year on different topics (eg, history taking, breaking bad news [84][85][86] and motivational interview 87 ). As part of this project, simulated patients will be asked to fill in a grid at the end of the interviews with students that includes the OSCE communication five-item checklist as well as the Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy 88 (see table 1 for sample items).…”
Section: Clinical Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%