2013
DOI: 10.3952/lithjphys.53205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underlayer effect on structural and magnetic properties of Co<sub>90</sub>Fe<sub>10</sub> thin films

Abstract: In the present study, the single layer Co 90 Fe 10 and X/Co 90 Fe 10 (X = Cu, Cr, Au, Ni 80 Fe 20 ) double layer films were investigated. Films were fabricated by DC magnetron sputtering at room temperature on Si substrates. In order to improve the soft magnetic properties of CoFe films, four different underlayers were examined. The coercivity values of the films were obtained by using a laboratory design magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) magnetometry. Magnetic force microscopy and x-ray diffraction results sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the room-temperature magnetization, M , versus magnetic field, H , in-plane for the easy and hard axis for all samples. The coercivity field for the thinner film ≈143 Oe is higher to the expected for FeCo alloys prepared by a classical sputtering method (50–100 Oe), concluding that a thin gold-underlayer can increase the H c . At the same time, for subsequent thicknesses, the coercivity field reflects a progressive decreasing, as shown in Table , which strongly suggests a tuning of the coercive field by the control of the underlayer thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Figure shows the room-temperature magnetization, M , versus magnetic field, H , in-plane for the easy and hard axis for all samples. The coercivity field for the thinner film ≈143 Oe is higher to the expected for FeCo alloys prepared by a classical sputtering method (50–100 Oe), concluding that a thin gold-underlayer can increase the H c . At the same time, for subsequent thicknesses, the coercivity field reflects a progressive decreasing, as shown in Table , which strongly suggests a tuning of the coercive field by the control of the underlayer thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%