2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underlying mechanism on source-sink carbon balance of grazed perennial grass during regrowth: Insights into optimal grazing regimes of restoration of degraded grasslands in a temperate steppe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in biomass projective cover and density in gypseous and sandy rangelands decreased with increasing grazing intensity. Changes in rangeland phylogenetic indicators depending on the level of livestock grazing affect quality indicators (22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The changes in biomass projective cover and density in gypseous and sandy rangelands decreased with increasing grazing intensity. Changes in rangeland phylogenetic indicators depending on the level of livestock grazing affect quality indicators (22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about the importance of some plants in the desert regions of Uzbekistan is recorded in the works of local and foreign authors (16). Knowing the development trends of rangeland plants and their resistance to anthropogenic influences, it is possible to regulate livestock grazing thus keep rangeland ecosystems in a highly productive state (21,22). The aim of this study was to determine the changes the amount of photosynthetic pigments under different livestock grazing conditions of A. diffusa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainable grazing management is vital to conserve biodiversity and enhance the multiple ecosystem functions (Liu et al, 2019, 2022). Many published studies have shown inconsistent outcomes that the exclusion of grazing, compared to MtH grazing, increases ecosystem services (Qin et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2021), reduces part of the ecosystem services (Xiang et al, 2021), or has no significant influence on ecosystem functions and service (Hao et al, 2021; Wang et al, 2021). Based on our in‐depth analyses, coupled with findings by other researchers, we summarize the following “speculative” mechanisms responsible for the outcomes of grazing activities on grassland ecosystem services: Grazing activity affects soil microbial biomass carbon—an essential component in soil C cycling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the conclusions on the general tendency of grassland ecosystems in response to grazing activities were inconsistent, inconclusive, or even controversial. For example, studies showed that the exclusion of grazing increased ecosystem services (Qin et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2021), decreased part of the ecosystem services (Xiang et al, 2021), or had no influence on the ecosystem functions and services (Hao et al, 2021; Wang et al, 2021). These inconsistent results are probably attributable to the complexity of plant–soil–microbe–environment interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cumulative GPP values at both paddocks suggest that there are compensatory mechanisms maintained similar CO2 assimilation at UG and GR. The regrowth of new leaves, which have greater stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity, associated with the higher penetration of solar radiation inside the canopy are the probable reasons for the higher carbon assimilation efficiency in grazed systems Zhang et al, 2021;Otieno et al, 2011). In addition, leaf regrowth contributed to maintaining T/ET at GR similar levels than the ones at UG in the end of the growing season (Fig.…”
Section: Cumulative Carbon and Water Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 98%