1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.1999.tb00111.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undernourished Patients With Hip Fracture: Poor Outcome is Not Due to Excess Infections

Abstract: Background: Undernourished hip fracture patients have poorer outcomes for undetermined reasons. We postulated that an immune deficit from malnutrition could lead to excess infections in these patients. Objective: To document the nutritional status (body mass index, BMI), infection rates and outcome in a group of patients with hip fracture. Subjects: One hundred consecutive cases, after excluding nursing home residents and those with end‐stage or malignant disease. Results: Low BMI was common and was associa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an extremely high prevalence (up to 63%) of pre-existing malnutrition amongst PFF patients on acute admission to hospital [ 9 , 10 ]. Malnutrition in this setting has consistently been demonstrated to lead to adverse patient outcomes through increasing the risk of postoperative complications [ 11 ], limiting participation in rehabilitation and delaying optimal recovery of ambulatory status and independence [ 12 , 13 ]. Moreover, there is a marked decline in nutritional status in these patients throughout the acute admission, commencing within one week of admission and continuing for six to twelve weeks post surgery [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an extremely high prevalence (up to 63%) of pre-existing malnutrition amongst PFF patients on acute admission to hospital [ 9 , 10 ]. Malnutrition in this setting has consistently been demonstrated to lead to adverse patient outcomes through increasing the risk of postoperative complications [ 11 ], limiting participation in rehabilitation and delaying optimal recovery of ambulatory status and independence [ 12 , 13 ]. Moreover, there is a marked decline in nutritional status in these patients throughout the acute admission, commencing within one week of admission and continuing for six to twelve weeks post surgery [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%