2020
DOI: 10.21834/ebpj.v5i14.2230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understandability and Actionability of Web-based Education Materials on Hypertension Management

Abstract: Hypertension websites are widely and easily accessible. This study aims to assess the understandability and actionability of hypertension websites. Eight websites that met the inclusion criteria were included. Eight experts were appointed to evaluate the websites using PEMAT instrument. The overall mean scores for understandability and actionability were 76.08% and 52.83% respectively. One website did not meet the criteria for understandability (score of ≥70%), while almost all materials failed to meet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PEMAT instrument has been used in numerous studies to assess the understandability and actionability of patient education materials. 28 - 30 The ability of the instrument to provide direct information on the good content of the material, the accuracy of visual aids, the choice of words, the appropriate layout and design, and the delivery strategies of the materials is the reason for choosing this instrument to evaluate the website in this study. In addition, the tool also provides suggestions for improving the teaching materials, including the consistent use of the active voice and the minimal use of medical jargon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PEMAT instrument has been used in numerous studies to assess the understandability and actionability of patient education materials. 28 - 30 The ability of the instrument to provide direct information on the good content of the material, the accuracy of visual aids, the choice of words, the appropriate layout and design, and the delivery strategies of the materials is the reason for choosing this instrument to evaluate the website in this study. In addition, the tool also provides suggestions for improving the teaching materials, including the consistent use of the active voice and the minimal use of medical jargon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although along with the advance of internet technology, searching online for health information is becoming more and more popular for the general population, the utility of health information online may largely depend on its readability. When seeking for health information online, the general public often find it difficult to understand the searching results [10][11]. Concerns about the readability of online material have been demonstrated in various studies [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%