Understanding addiction, relapse and recovery amongst substance using offenders – a qualitative study informed by developmental psychological theories

Abstract

Purpose Psychological developmental informed theories imply that addiction is not exclusively due to the addictive properties of the substance but that early psycho-social experiences are influential on later life. The purpose of this paper is to understand substance dependency, relapse and recovery amongst community-based substance using offenders in relation to their childhoods, relationships and significant life events, from their perspective. A key aim was to help better inform policy and practice. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative study (interpretative phenomenological analysis) was used to understand the impact of childhood, relationships and significant life events amongst (N = 17) adult ex/offenders with substance use dependency problems, (who were part of the UK Government rehabilitation programme), to understand their substance use and recovery from their own perspectives. Findings Four main superordinate themes were developed illustrating participants extremely adverse childhoods. Substance use was a means to cope with current and past trauma and crises and to help manage the emotions and mental health which could accompany these difficulties. Managing recovery was about learning to manage life itself, including emotions, mental health problems, trauma/responses, relationships and everyday life. Originality/value This group is under researched where qualitative methods have been used. The study focussed on early-psycho-social experiences and relationships and the influence of these throughout the life cycle, in relation to their substance use. The study was informed by theories often used in therapeutic settings but rarely in research, (Orford, 2008; Khantzian, 2012; Flores, 2012, Van Der Kolk, 2014).

Interpretive case study to understand online communication in an e-tendering project implementation

“…Penelitan lain di masa depan harus fokus pada bagaimana masalah etika dapat dikurangi. They still concentrate on conventional data gathering approaches such as face-to-face interviews (Basch, Melchers, Kurz, Krieger, & Miller, 2021;Myers & Newman, 2007;Vogl, 2013), focus groups discussion (Love, Vetere, & Davis, 2020;Muijeen, Kongvattananon, & Somprasert, 2020), and ethnographic studies (Andreassen, Christensen, & Møller, 2020;Tobin, 2022).…”