2021
DOI: 10.1037/sah0000283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and addressing stigma through qualitative research: Four reasons why we need qualitative studies.

Abstract: People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(180 reference statements)
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, with a cure for HIV on the horizon, stigma reduction efforts in the LGBTQI+ community will become even more important (Wu et al, 2018). Community education programs that use evidence-based approaches to correcting misinformation, foregrounding U=U messages, taking the perspective of people with HIV, and promoting empathy are imperative (Brown et al, 2017;Stutterheim & Ratcliffe, 2021). Also, stigma reduction efforts in health care contexts must be prioritized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, with a cure for HIV on the horizon, stigma reduction efforts in the LGBTQI+ community will become even more important (Wu et al, 2018). Community education programs that use evidence-based approaches to correcting misinformation, foregrounding U=U messages, taking the perspective of people with HIV, and promoting empathy are imperative (Brown et al, 2017;Stutterheim & Ratcliffe, 2021). Also, stigma reduction efforts in health care contexts must be prioritized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, studying the embodiment of workers who work with stigmatizing emotions is important to unravelling how discriminatory experiences are sensemade and experienced, and the impact thereof, and serve as a springboard for activist research. These topics would lend themselves well to ethnographic explorations, as well as other critical qualitative tools (e.g., analyses of discourse) because qualitative methodologies are especially pertinent for stigma research (Stutterheim and Ratcliffe, 2021). We support the application of IPA to these complex phenomena with the objective to sensemake an embodied experiential understanding, and also encourage the application of Critical Femininities (Hoskin and Blair, 2021) to emotional 'dirty' work given how this lens can unearth the taken-for-granted gendered assumptions of emotion work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies might extend our findings by employing an inductive approach (wherein codes are derived directly from the data) to generate additional themes. Importantly, our results may be easily expanded upon in future measurement development studies, which we suggest be conducted using community-engaged research methods with the TGD community (Stutterheim & Ratcliffe, 2021). Critically, executing these next steps in research may enhance clinical care for TGD youth by equipping clinicians with the tools necessary for adequately identifying and addressing factors associated with their enhanced risk for mental health problems.…”
Section: Strengths Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Scholars suggest that their development be informed by qualitative research elucidating phenomena targeted by an assessment, particularly if those phenomena are complex, such as identity-related adversity (Creswell & Zhang, 2009;Stutterheim & Ratcliffe, 2021). We believe that our study provides one such framework.…”
Section: Recommendations For Measure Development Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation