2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ase51524.2021.9678611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and Detecting Performance Bugs in Markdown Compilers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DGF has been used to detect specific bug types, such as memory consumption bugs, and algorithm complexity bugs. Examples include MemLock [34], SlowFuzz [38], PERFFUZZ [37] and MDPERFFUZZ [102]. …”
Section: Research Progress On Dgfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DGF has been used to detect specific bug types, such as memory consumption bugs, and algorithm complexity bugs. Examples include MemLock [34], SlowFuzz [38], PERFFUZZ [37] and MDPERFFUZZ [102]. …”
Section: Research Progress On Dgfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, DGF can detect non-crash bugs based on customized indicators. For example, it can find uncontrolled memory consumption bugs under the guidance of memory usage [34] and find algorithmic complexity vulnerabilities under the guidance of resource usage [38,102].…”
Section: Application Of Dgfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have employed grey-box and white-box methodologies for this vulnerability [99,114]. Researchers and commercial tools offer blackbox and grey-box scanning for diverse vulnerabilities [25,52,53], including algorithmic complexity vulnerabilities [31,72,87], service crashes [18,19,62], cross-site scripting (XSS) [24,55,103], and SQL injection [78]. Notably, some researchers have pursued the opposite of our Consistent Sanitization Assumption to identify cases where backend sanitization appears problematically inconsistent [71,84].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheduling [14,[24][25][26] Instrumentation [27][28][29][30] Hybrid Fuzzing [31][32][33][34] Sanitizer [35][36][37][38] Directed Fuzzing [17,[39][40][41] Others [16,[42][43][44][45][46][47] Fuzzing Evaluation Fuzzing Benchmarks [48][49][50][51] Empirical Study [52][53][54][55][56] Targeting Specific Types of Bugs Di erential Fuzzing [57][58][59] Performance Fuzzing [20,[60][61][62] Others [21,63,64] Targeting Specific Kinds of Targets Kernel Fuzzing [65][66]…”
Section: Sub-categories and Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%