1995
DOI: 10.2307/353409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
180
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
180
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For the current study, qualitative research methods in particular were used to capture findings that compliment and provide depth and additional meaning to those findings available through the quantitative scales. 40 The mixed methods approach to analysis provided critical information necessary to move the process-oriented topic of policy implementation forward. [40][41][42] Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 15.0 to generate frequencies, including mode, mean, and standard deviation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the current study, qualitative research methods in particular were used to capture findings that compliment and provide depth and additional meaning to those findings available through the quantitative scales. 40 The mixed methods approach to analysis provided critical information necessary to move the process-oriented topic of policy implementation forward. [40][41][42] Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 15.0 to generate frequencies, including mode, mean, and standard deviation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The mixed methods approach to analysis provided critical information necessary to move the process-oriented topic of policy implementation forward. [40][41][42] Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 15.0 to generate frequencies, including mode, mean, and standard deviation. For qualitative data, thematic categories were determined through an iterative process of systematic data review and (re)classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, I felt confident that the themes were inclusive of data across the interviews. Data analysis and coding processes proceeded simultaneously with the data collection (Ambert, Adler, Adler, & Detzner, 1995), so that initial interview data were examined and analyzed as I arranged and conducted subsequent interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the researchers are a part of the data obtaining and knowledge generation process in qualitative studies, their possible biases could confound variables (Ambert, Adler, Adler & Detzner, 1995). Reporting their potentially confounding characteristics is a way to prevent this: the authors were trained for both cognitive interpersonal therapy and ST, which are basically relational approaches.…”
Section: The Researchers' Rolementioning
confidence: 99%