Understanding and Making Use of Academic Authors’ Open Access Rights

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Authors of academic works do not take full advantage of the self-archiving rights that they retain in their publications, though research shows that many academic authors are well-aligned (at least in principle) with open access (OA) principles. This article explains how institutionally-assisted self-archiving in open access repositories can effectively take advantage of retained rights and highlights at least one method of facilitating this process through automated means. METHODS To understand the scope of author-retained rights (including the right to purchase hybrid or other open access options) at some sample universities, author-rights data through the SHERPA/RoMEO API was combined with individual article citations (from Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science) for works published over a one-year period (2011) and authored by individuals affiliated with five major U.S. research universities. RESULTS Authors retain significant rights in the articles that they create. Of the 29,322 unique articles authored over the one year period at the five universities, 28.83 percent could be archived in final PDF form and 87.95 percent could be archived as the post-print version. Nearly 43.47 percent also provided authors the choice of purchasing a hybrid paid open access option. DISCUSSION A significant percentage of current published output could be archived with little or no author intervention. With prior approval through an open access policy or otherwise, article manuscripts or final PDFs can be obtained and archived by library staff, and hybrid paid-OA options could be negotiated and exploited by library administrators. CONCLUSION Although mandates, legislation, and other policy tools may be useful to promote open access, many institutions already have the ability to increase the percentage of accessible works by taking advantage of retained author rights and hybrid OA options.

Same Question, Different World: Replicating an Open Access Research Impact Study

“…Estimates have put that percentage in the range of 11 67 to 29 percent. 68 Although we did not assess whether the publisher PDFs were permitted for our sample, other studies have found that posted PDFs generally were not permitted. 69…”

Institutional Repositories, Open Access and Copyright: What Are the Practices and Implications?

“…However, not all versions of publications are permitted to be downloaded into repositories, but pre and post-prints are allowed by many publishers. In some cases, published articles in pdf format can be submitted to open access repositories or other venues by paying a high fee to the publisher (Hansen 2012). Peroni and co-authors cite studies showing that OA allows discoverability for research articles and datasets "made publicly available increase citation rates of article between 9% and 30%" (2015).…”

Evaluating Zotero, SHERPA/RoMEO, and Unpaywall in an institutional repository workflow

“…3 The current study is a follow-up to this study, but concentrates on journal publications in order to provide an evaluation of all three tools in the workflow, as SHERPA/RoMEO's and Unpaywall's services are geared towards journal articles. (Table 2) (Abad-García et al, 2013;Covey, 2009;Fathli et al, 2014;Hansen, 2012;Jamali, 2016;Lyons & Booth, 2011;Walters & Daley, 2018). If eliminating the highest and lowest percentages, the range of journals without clear policies in SHERPA/RoMEO is closer to 10.0% to 15.0%.…”