2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and neutralising covid-19 misinformation and disinformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, environmental and health crises represent a fertile ground for uncertainty, confusion, disinformation, and misinformation (Nelson et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2022). It is not surprising, given the diversity of social structures that characterize the post-truth culture, such as epistemic bubbles that arise from an inadequate (though usually unintentional) coverage resulting from the omission of important epistemic resources (e.g., hypotheses, evidence, arguments), as well as echo chambers, in which diverse viewpoints relevant to the discussions at hand are actively excluded and discredited (Nguyen, 2020), the latter being particularly relevant when explaining the resistance to evidence that characterizes climate change deniers (Nguyen, 2020) and the anti-vaccine attitudes in COVID-19 pandemic (Müller et al, 2022).…”
Section: Intellectual Virtues In the Context Of Having Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, environmental and health crises represent a fertile ground for uncertainty, confusion, disinformation, and misinformation (Nelson et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2022). It is not surprising, given the diversity of social structures that characterize the post-truth culture, such as epistemic bubbles that arise from an inadequate (though usually unintentional) coverage resulting from the omission of important epistemic resources (e.g., hypotheses, evidence, arguments), as well as echo chambers, in which diverse viewpoints relevant to the discussions at hand are actively excluded and discredited (Nguyen, 2020), the latter being particularly relevant when explaining the resistance to evidence that characterizes climate change deniers (Nguyen, 2020) and the anti-vaccine attitudes in COVID-19 pandemic (Müller et al, 2022).…”
Section: Intellectual Virtues In the Context Of Having Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Editors at medical journals had to sift through a huge amount of research and curate it for a public and policy makers that were hungry for reliable information. The extent to which social media provided a platform for harmful and unscientific ideas was dismaying8 and exacerbated the pressure for editors and journals to offset such misinformation. The Surgisphere scandal, which led the New England Journal of Medicine and the Lancet to retract two high profile covid-19 papers, showed that even the best journals and their editors can be duped 9…”
Section: Maintaining Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 9 Loss of trust has been fuelled by attacks on health workers -during and since the pandemic -typically from those opposed to the measures that were necessary to interrupt transmission of SARS-CoV-2. 10 This has been facilitated by social media, spreading disinformation seeking to undermine trust in science and the health workers who use it to deliver evidence based care. If the public is to retain and regain trust, they must be confident that the system can transform in ways that allow it to meet their needs now and, as importantly, in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their experiences leave them vulnerable to the arguments by some that universal healthcare — to which governments have committed in the Sustainable Development Goals — is somehow unaffordable or unsustainable 89. Loss of trust has been fuelled by attacks on health workers — during and since the pandemic — typically from those opposed to the measures that were necessary to interrupt transmission of SARS-CoV-2 10. This has been facilitated by social media, spreading disinformation seeking to undermine trust in science and the health workers who use it to deliver evidence based care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%