Understanding and overcoming obstacles in adaptive management

Månsson, Johan; Eriksson, Louise; Hodgson, Isla D.; Elmberg, Johan; Hessel, Rebecca; Johansson, Maria; Liljebäck, Niklas; Nilsson, Lovisa; Olsson, Camilla; Pärt, Tomas; Sandström, Camilla; Tombre, Ingunn; Redpath, Steve

doi:10.1016/j.tree.2022.08.009

Cited by 26 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 93 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Respondents' concerns about a perceived lack of genuine consultation and acknowledgement of feedback, reveal the importance of clear communication at all stages of an environmental management project that aims to standardise and streamline practices. AsMånsson et al (2023) also argue, by developing understanding of the socio-cultural challenges to the implementation of a new environmental management approach, our research demonstrates the advantages of such transdisciplinary learning to inform the standardisation of ecological monitoring.…”

mentioning

confidence: 66%

The critical social processes for standardising the ecological monitoring of Australian landscapes

Grypma,

Bardsley,

Sparrow

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The social aspects of ecological monitoring are often overlooked. Ecological monitoring provides vital information for decision-makers and natural resource management practitioners to make informed environmental management decisions. For a long time, ecological monitoring across Australia has utilised a wide variety of different methodologies resulting in data that is difficult to analyse across place or time. Much of the ecological data that is currently generated in incomparable with other data or it has been collected using inappropriate methods for the intended aims. In response to these limitations, a new systematic approach to ecological monitoring has been developed in collaboration between the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network and the Australian Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water - the Ecological Monitoring System Australia. We found that environmental management stakeholders are not opposing the standardisation of ecological monitoring. However, key concerns emerged regarding the capacity needed to implement the standard protocols, the utility of the resultant data for regional projects, and the adaptability of the EMSA. Stakeholders emphasised the need for autonomy and flexibility, so their participation in protocol development can facilitate regional adoption of the standards. Respondents’ concerns about a perceived lack of genuine consultation and acknowledgement of feedback revealed the importance of clear communication at all stages of an environmental management project aiming to standardise practices. New approaches to environmental management will increasingly have to account for the complexity of socio-ecological systems in order to overcome the unprecedented challenges that will arise in the wake of future global change.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 66%

The critical social processes for standardising the ecological monitoring of Australian landscapes

Grypma,

Bardsley,

Sparrow

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…PA management is not confined to PA boundaries but requires systemic action to reduce corruption, strengthen law enforcement and improve stakeholder engagement [36]. Issues such as these, where governance systems in highly complex and dynamic systems are not adapted to properly facilitate the adaptive management process, persist throughout the world and create barriers to implementation of adaptive management, including monitoring and evaluation processes [40].…”

Section: K2c Pa Managers' Perspectives On Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunities and Barriers to Monitoring and Evaluating Management Effectiveness in Protected Areas within the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Region, South Africa

Wilson

Anthony

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Protected areas (PAs) that are not effectively managed will not contribute meaningfully to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework Target 3, which aims to ensure that a minimum of 30 per cent of terrestrial, inland water, coastal and marine areas are effectively conserved and managed. Our study examined the monitoring and evaluation of protected area management effectiveness (PAME) as part of an adaptive management process in the Kruger to Canyons (K2C) Biosphere Region in South Africa. Our mixed methods approach, using online questionnaires, interviews, and focus groups, revealed that most PA managers in the network were familiar with the concept of adaptive management. The most widely used PAME evaluation tool used in the region was the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT). Some PAs did not use a formal tool but gathered scientific data using methods such as game counts and vegetation surveys to judge management effectiveness. Additionally, several managers that did not use a formal tool mentioned that they were constrained by time, staff capacity or budget. The introduction of a simpler tool for managers that are time- or resource-constrained or who are working in a newly declared or in-process PA may improve PAME evaluation within the network. We suggest that there is a need for improved communication, co-learning, and information sharing regarding PAME evaluation tools.

show abstract

“…Co‐existence is, however, often a complex challenge due to conflicting interests and uncertainties in social, economic and ecological aspects of the management systems (Game et al., 2014; Mason et al., 2018). This calls for an evidence‐based approach in which management strategies are adapted and applied based on gained knowledge (Månsson et al., 2023; Mason et al., 2018). In the context of agricultural food production, there is also a need for interventions to be cost‐ and time‐efficient in order to minimise crop loss caused by wildlife and to keep agriculture economically sustainable (MacMillan et al., 2004; Vickery & Summers, 1992).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of a diversionary field and other habitats by large grazing birds in a landscape managed for agriculture and wetland biodiversity

Nilsson,

Månsson,

Elmberg

et al. 2024

Ecol Sol and Evidence

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several populations of cranes, geese, and swans are thriving and increasing in modern agricultural landscapes. Abundant populations are causing conservation conflicts, as they may affect agricultural production and biodiversity negatively. Management strategies involving provisioning of attractive diversionary fields where birds are tolerated can be used to reduce negative impact to growing crops. To improve such strategies, knowledge of how the birds interact with the landscape and respond to current management interventions is key. We used GPS locations from tagged common cranes (Grus grus) and greylag geese (Anser anser) to assess how they use and select differentially managed habitats, such as diversionary fields to decrease impact on agriculture and wetlands protected for biodiversity conservation. Our findings show a high probability of presence of common cranes and greylag geese in the protected area and in the diversionary field, but also on arable fields, potentially causing negative impact on agricultural production and wetland biodiversity. We outline recommendations for how to improve the practice of diversionary fields and complementary management to reduce risk of negative impact of large grazing birds in landscapes tailored for both conservation and conventional agriculture.

show abstract

Understanding and overcoming obstacles in adaptive management

Cited by 26 publications

References 93 publications

The critical social processes for standardising the ecological monitoring of Australian landscapes

The critical social processes for standardising the ecological monitoring of Australian landscapes

Opportunities and Barriers to Monitoring and Evaluating Management Effectiveness in Protected Areas within the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Region, South Africa

Selection of a diversionary field and other habitats by large grazing birds in a landscape managed for agriculture and wetland biodiversity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About