2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and Predicting the Cause of Defects in Graphene Oxide Nanostructures Using Machine Learning

Abstract: Machine learning is a powerful way of uncovering hidden structure/property relationships in nanoscale materials, and it is tempting to assign structural causes to properties based on feature rankings reported by interpretable models. In this study of defective graphene oxide nanoflakes, we use classification, regression, and causal inference to show that not all important structural features directly influence the concentration of broken bonds, as a representative property. We find that while the presence of o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 By combining a sufficiently large and diverse ensemble of candidate nanostructures generated using conventional simulations with an appropriate regressor it is possible to identify the set of features that drive performance, 40 and in some cases conditions required to deliver the right structures in practice. 41 ML is also capable of determining classes of like-structures based on similarity, and then correlate these classes with some performance indicators to provide a more averaged response to structure/property prediction, akin to measuring a diverse mix of sizes and shapes. 42,43 Most importantly, ML is providing to be invaluable in the modern design of catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 By combining a sufficiently large and diverse ensemble of candidate nanostructures generated using conventional simulations with an appropriate regressor it is possible to identify the set of features that drive performance, 40 and in some cases conditions required to deliver the right structures in practice. 41 ML is also capable of determining classes of like-structures based on similarity, and then correlate these classes with some performance indicators to provide a more averaged response to structure/property prediction, akin to measuring a diverse mix of sizes and shapes. 42,43 Most importantly, ML is providing to be invaluable in the modern design of catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attempts to create larger databases of ML-based GO structures have been made. 62 , 63 We focus here on a more limited set of structures, because of the computational demands of full electronic-structure computations. Moreover, given the intrinsic locality of core–electron excitations, the results obtained here, within periodic boundary conditions, and utilizing data clustering, are representative of larger systems and can be directly compared with experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[101] In another recent study by Motevalli et al, machine learning algorithms were used to understand and predict the cause of defects in graphene nanosheets. [102] Several such clever amalgamations of disciplines would provide us with valuable insights into graphene nanostructure fabrication and properties. In the future, graphene would, thus, inevitably be the "magic lamp" of nanotechnology with utmost promise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%