2011
DOI: 10.4324/9780203888261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and Treating Dissociative Identity Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…These sudden disruptions are difficult to understand on the basis of previous exchanges. The conflicting activation of the defense and the attachment system together with the activation of controlling strategies lies at the root of many traumatic transferences and countertransferences (Howell, 2011). Efforts to control emotional storms might be achieved by becoming a dominant partner who is bullying and coercive in intimate relations.…”
Section: Use Of Attachment Theory In Clinical Dialogue 409mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sudden disruptions are difficult to understand on the basis of previous exchanges. The conflicting activation of the defense and the attachment system together with the activation of controlling strategies lies at the root of many traumatic transferences and countertransferences (Howell, 2011). Efforts to control emotional storms might be achieved by becoming a dominant partner who is bullying and coercive in intimate relations.…”
Section: Use Of Attachment Theory In Clinical Dialogue 409mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary theory reformulates the therapist's dissociative countertransference as an emerging state of resonance with the patient-a reflection of her intentional presence and attunement to that which is unwelcome (Howell, 2011;Siegel, 2010). Relational analytic trauma theorists conceptualize the unwelcome and unbidden in the dissociative field as dissociated self-states, parts of the patient's (or therapist's) self that are defensively split off from the conscious day-to-day experience of oneself.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Relational analytic trauma theorists conceptualize the unwelcome and unbidden in the dissociative field as dissociated self-states, parts of the patient's (or therapist's) self that are defensively split off from the conscious day-to-day experience of oneself. Current thinking in the field of relational psychoanalysis suggests that the only way to access this dissociated content is by way of the intersubjective therapeutic relationship, and more specifically, the therapist's internal and subjective experience of the patient (Bromberg, 1998(Bromberg, , 2003(Bromberg, , 2011Davies & Frawley, 1991, 1994Howell, 2005Howell, , 2011Levenkron, 2009;Stern, 2003Stern, , 2010. These theorists argue that dissociated aspects of the patient's self will become enacted in the therapy relationship, and then be available for symbolic formulation in the mind of the therapist as the therapist engages interpersonally with the patient.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many other valuable accounts of DID treatment exist, and were also used as references in assembling a picture of consensus practice (Boon, Steele, & van der Hart, 2011; Chefetz, 2015; Cloitre, Cohen, & Koenen, 2006; Howell, 2011; Kluft, 1999; Loewenstein, 2006; Putnam, 1989; Ross & Halpern, 2009). Our adaptation of DBT for DID introduces several therapeutic interventions and strategies which are drawn from consensus DID treatment and would be applicable in Stage 1, including “mapping the alters”, “grounding”, “containment” and “safe place” imagery.…”
Section: Modifications From Current Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%