2009
DOI: 10.7275/da8t-4g52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
112
0
9

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
112
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as multiple item variables as DSCHOOL, MONITOR, RELIGION, P_TOLER and PEER_USE are concerned; we summed the evaluations on each item of these factors. It is a simple but usual way to deal with this question in empirical research [43]. Subsequently, we obtain the membership evaluation of these variables by using a common procedure in fsQCA [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as multiple item variables as DSCHOOL, MONITOR, RELIGION, P_TOLER and PEER_USE are concerned; we summed the evaluations on each item of these factors. It is a simple but usual way to deal with this question in empirical research [43]. Subsequently, we obtain the membership evaluation of these variables by using a common procedure in fsQCA [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three factors with significant loadings in the four-factor analysis were the same as found with the three-factor EFA, and the strength of the loadings was similar. A non-refined weighted sum was used to compute factor scores, as described by DiStefano et al [24]. Performance parameters with loadings below 0.5 were excluded from the factor score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, to explore their factor structure, the ARHQ and AMHQ were each analyzed following steps previously taken in Welcome and Meza (2019 ; particularly for the ARHQ and the naming convention for its derived factors), which include: establishing the KMO (Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin) value of sampling adequacy, conducting the BTS (Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity) for suitability in capturing sample variance, visualizing scree plot to estimate the number of factors to extract, and performing maximum likelihood method with oblique rotation (direct oblimin) to derive the respective components, which were rendered through a regression-based approach to calculate factor scores ( Tabachnick and Fidell, 2007 ; DiStefano et al, 2009 ). Note that the directionality for the computed factor scores remain consistent with the directionality of the questions on each scale – that is, higher scores on any factors extracted from the ARHQ or AMHQ indicate, e.g., increased difficulties with learning to read or do simple arithmetic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%