The Investigation of the performance of poly(phenylene) based anion exchange membranes (AEMs) in a direct methanol fuel cell is reported. The fuel cell performances were tested with different anode gas diffusion layers as a function of concentrations of fuel and electrolyte using two commercially available platinum catalysts supported on carbon. Normalized current density values demonstrated good performance for a poly(phenylene) AEM, with a cation consisting of six methylene spacers attached to a trimethyl ammonium group, with a maximum current density of 11.8 mA cm −2 mg −1 in a KOH free fuel. The platinum catalyst (46%) from Tanaka showed a better performance (10.4 mA cm −2 mg −1 ) compared to the platinum catalyst from E-TEK (5.1 mA cm −2 mg −1 ) in 1M methanol fuel feed under identical conditions. We observed that the MEA with a Zoltek gas diffusion layer on the anode showed the best performance (226 mA cm −2 and 53.8 mW cm −2 ) in the presence of KOH, suggesting that a hydrophilic gas diffusion layer plays a significant role in improving the fuel cell performance. A durability test for a MEA in 1M methanol and 1M KOH for 67 h showed an overall degradation rate of 400 μV h Direct methanol fuel cells based on proton exchange membranes (PEMs) have received considerable attention, as compared to hydrogen fuel cells, they have potential system simplicity, high system energy density, improved volumetric fuel storage and fuel supply.
1,2Direct methanol alkaline fuel cells (DMAFCs) which employ an anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolyte are more attractive than devices based on PEMs as they should provide improved electrode kinetics, simple water management, lower methanol permeability, and use of non-platinum metal catalysts.3-6 Solid-state AEM electrolytes are more attractive than the conventional liquid KOH electrolytes as the carbonates and bicarbonates formed during operation do not precipitate as the cation is the AEM, and although adding an additional ionic resistance to the electrode, do diffuse through the cationic ionomer. 7,8 In spite of these advantages, it is important to note that except for a few reports, high performance in DMAFCs are shown only in the presence of the aqueous basic electrolyte, even for commercially available AEMs.9,10 In general, alkaline DMFC studies employ commercially available AEMs, such as Tokuyama A-006, A-010, Fumatech FAA-2, and Morgane ADP from Solvay. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Radiation grafted membranes have been demonstrated to be promising AEMs for DMAFCs with a KOH free methanol fuel.17,18 Still a great amount of research is being focused on improving the performance of available commercial AEMs as well as on development of new AEMs to achieve stable, highly conducting, and mechanically robust membranes for fuel cells with high performance and long durability.There are very few alkaline direct methanol fuel cell reports where neat methanol is used and aqueous methanol is still the fuel of choice, in fact high power densities have only been achieved for these ...