2009
DOI: 10.1038/nmat2442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface

Abstract: Rapid growth in nanotechnology is increasing the likelihood of engineered nanomaterials coming into contact with humans and the environment. Nanoparticles interacting with proteins, membranes, cells, DNA and organelles establish a series of nanoparticle/biological interfaces that depend on colloidal forces as well as dynamic biophysicochemical interactions. These interactions lead to the formation of protein coronas, particle wrapping, intracellular uptake and biocatalytic processes that could have biocompatib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

66
5,289
4
43

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,283 publications
(5,508 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
66
5,289
4
43
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of ZnO nanoparticles were acicular in shape and clustered typically in the 30 nm to several 100 nm range (Fig. 1A), which may be attributed to the reduced surface charge and thus weaker electrostatic repulsive forces (Nel et al, 2009). Time-dependent changes in agglomerate levels were assessed by measuring particle size distribution in LB broth in the absence of bacteria at 0 hrs and 24hrs (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of ZnO nanoparticles were acicular in shape and clustered typically in the 30 nm to several 100 nm range (Fig. 1A), which may be attributed to the reduced surface charge and thus weaker electrostatic repulsive forces (Nel et al, 2009). Time-dependent changes in agglomerate levels were assessed by measuring particle size distribution in LB broth in the absence of bacteria at 0 hrs and 24hrs (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 4 h, diffusive green regions instead of spotty fluorescence signaling spread inside the cytosol. In this scenario, most of the lysosomes were swelled and ruptured, and could not be well labeled with LysoTracker 35. Here, PEI offered the “proton sponge” effect for the successful escape of the nanoparticles from the lysosomes and the follow‐up efficient release of free FAM‐siHIF‐1α in the cytoplasm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons why TRc preferencially stained the lysosomes may be ascribe to two aspects, i) TRc molecules self‐assembled into nanoparticles (Figure S7, Supporting Information). Since the nanoparticles were generally ingested into cells through endocytosis and have large chances to be transported to lysosomes 17. TRc molecules can ignite lysosomes when they were released from TRc nanoaggregation; ii) By comparing the chemical structures of the TRc with some commercially available lysotrackers from ThermoFisher Scientific (Figure S8, Supporting Information), and publishing lysosome probes 18.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%