2001
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00491-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding bone strength: size isn’t everything

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
168
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
168
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone biomechanical integrity can be partitioned into the following contributing components: the amount, architecture and distribution, and bone material composition and strength [32,33]. The experimental approach we took was to examine bone biomechanical integrity of femurs from two distinct mouse strains and three genotypes at three age points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone biomechanical integrity can be partitioned into the following contributing components: the amount, architecture and distribution, and bone material composition and strength [32,33]. The experimental approach we took was to examine bone biomechanical integrity of femurs from two distinct mouse strains and three genotypes at three age points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone strength has been shown to depend on both its density and structure [9], which may or may not be interdependent. Density measures alone, although widely used clinically, cannot identify osteoporotic subjects who will sustain fractures, due to the large overlap in bone mass measures in individuals with fractures and those without fractures [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density measures alone, although widely used clinically, cannot identify osteoporotic subjects who will sustain fractures, due to the large overlap in bone mass measures in individuals with fractures and those without fractures [10]. Other factors including bone size, architecture and material properties must be considered [9]. Multiple approaches such as Mean Intercept Lengths (MIL) [10] and the Fourier power spectrum [11,12,13,14] have been used to characterize the structure of trabecular bone, particularly in describing orientation disparity or anisotropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the test, appropriate measurements of bone size and length must be reported so that data can be normalized for geometric differences. To understand bone structural performance, structural measurements must be accompanied either by cross-sectional geometry or tissue material properties [20]. For example, whole femora of A/J mice are significantly stronger but more brittle than C57BL/6J when tested in four-point bending [lo].…”
Section: Mechunicul Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%