2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Carbamoyl Phosphate Synthetase Deficiency: Impact of Clinical Mutations on Enzyme Functionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since defects in CPS1 are known to trigger hyper-ammonemia in humans (Yefimenko et al, 2005), we predicted that the deficiency in SIRT5 KO mice after 48-hour fasting might result in hyper-ammonemia. Thus, we subjected wild type and SIRT5 KO mice to 48 hours fasting and then determined their blood ammonia levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since defects in CPS1 are known to trigger hyper-ammonemia in humans (Yefimenko et al, 2005), we predicted that the deficiency in SIRT5 KO mice after 48-hour fasting might result in hyper-ammonemia. Thus, we subjected wild type and SIRT5 KO mice to 48 hours fasting and then determined their blood ammonia levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we show that this sirtuin is a mitochondrial matrix NAD-dependent deacetylase that is specific for carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1), the committed and regulated enzyme of the urea cycle (Haussinger, 1990; Meijer et al, 1990). CPS1 is critical in the detoxification of excess ammonia, and patients with CPS1 deficiency suffer from hyper-ammonemia, which can lead to mental retardation and death (Yefimenko et al, 2005). In normal individuals, excess ammonia is produced when amino acids are used as energy sources, for example during fasting (Meijer et al, 1990; Morris, 2002; Schimke, 1962b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also document for some mutations and propose for other mutations that they have effects of greater or lower magnitude on the V max of the enzyme. This effect could be due to gross defects on domain architecture, that, for example, could block the conduit of the activating allosteric NAG signal, or the tunnel [27] through which intermediates must flow between both phosphorylation centers; or it could derive from more subtle changes such as the hampering of the concerted opening [56,57] of the B subdomains of both phosphorylation domains to allow product release. Indeed, mutations in the UFSD could be in the signaling path between both phosphorylation centers since the UFSD contacts the B domain of the carbamate phosphorylation domain, which is believed to trigger the concerted opening [57], and it also contacts the active site of the bicarbonate phosphorylation domain, which is to be opened (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no prevalent ''common'' mutation was identified, some of the mutations were shared by more than one family, probably reflecting relatively common mutations among Japanese. Figure 1 describes the position of these mutations in relation to previously identified functional domains of the CPS1 molecule (Yefimenko et al 2005). All but two missense mutations (G79E and Y212N) were Aoshima et al 2001b clustered around the two phosphorylation domains, while the nonsense and in/del mutations are scattered throughout the gene.…”
Section: Dna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%