1982
DOI: 10.1080/10862968209547466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Classroom Events: A Critique of Durkin, with an Alternative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…is a way of activating prior knowledge in students. A reanalysis of the data which took into account teachers' intentions, as discussed by Heap (1982) revealed that teachers attempted to integrate prior knowledge into most of their instruction. The words they used and the concepts they represented tended to be those that fifth and sixth graders would likely have experience with.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Effective Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is a way of activating prior knowledge in students. A reanalysis of the data which took into account teachers' intentions, as discussed by Heap (1982) revealed that teachers attempted to integrate prior knowledge into most of their instruction. The words they used and the concepts they represented tended to be those that fifth and sixth graders would likely have experience with.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Effective Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To various purposes of analysis, demonstration and instruction, exemplary studies of single sequences and, by implication, instructions for what a reader could hope for from them, are to be found in Moerman (1988), Sacks (1974), and Schegloff (1972Schegloff ( , 1987Schegloff ( , 1988. See also Whelan et al (1988), and for classroom affairs, Heap (1982), and Meyer (1990).…”
Section: Locus Of Ordermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This stance has of course had implications on the choice of methods and how the study unfolded. Whereas methods indeed can be viewed as a means of discovery, they are also a constraint (Heap 1982). The choice of methods and our ways of analysis bring us closer to understanding certain perspectives and phenomena while making it difficult to grasp others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%