2022
DOI: 10.4054/mpidr-wp-2022-029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding cognitive impairment in the U.S. through the lenses of intersectionality and (un)conditional cumulative (dis)advantage

Abstract: Working papers of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed in working papers are attributable to the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because cognitive functioning is curvilinear over the life-course ( Hale et al, 2022 ), we adjusted for mean-centered age and a quadratic age term. We also adjusted for a variable of time centered at the transition ( t = 0 for the first wave when respondents reported having grandchildren).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because cognitive functioning is curvilinear over the life-course ( Hale et al, 2022 ), we adjusted for mean-centered age and a quadratic age term. We also adjusted for a variable of time centered at the transition ( t = 0 for the first wave when respondents reported having grandchildren).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growing interest in how dimensions of social stratification are intertwined, practically no quantitative research has investigated cognitive functioning from an intersectional perspective ( Hale et al, 2022 ). In the present study we investigate inequalities in healthy aging by studying the association of the transition to grandparenthood with cognitive functioning, and how the impact differs across intersectional strata defined by sex/gender, migration, education, and occupation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growing interest in how dimensions of social strati cation are intertwined, practically no quantitative research has investigated cognitive functioning from an intersectional perspective (Hale et al, 2022). In the present study we investigate inequalities in healthy aging by studying the association of the transition to grandparenthood with cognitive functioning, and how the impact differs across intersectional strata de ned by sex/gender, migration, education, and occupation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We additionally adopt the sociological concept of cumulative (dis)advantage (Dannefer, 1987;DiPrete & Eirich, 2006;Merton, 1968Merton, , 1988 and apply it to the idea of health and disease accumulation. We define cumulative (dis)advantage as in Hale et al (2022), based on two risk factors, education and gender, and assume that lower MMLE is better. We also assume that having more education and being male will result in lower MMLE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, however, the gender difference is larger amongst high-educated (the difference in MMLE between women and men is larger amongst high-educated) we can say that high-educated men experience cumulative advantage. Based on this definition, cumulative advantage and cumulative disadvantage are diametrically opposed concepts -either one or the other can occur, but not both (Hale et al, 2022). There is also the possibility of no evidence for either cumulative advantage or disadvantage, if the educational differences are exactly the same for both men and women across education groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%