2005
DOI: 10.1177/0899764005275411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Collaboration Among Nonprofit Organizations: Combining Resource Dependency, Institutional, and Network Perspectives

Abstract: Existing research stops short of explaining why nonprofit organizations develop certain forms of collaborations instead of others. In this article, the authors combine resource dependency, institutional, and network theories to examine the factors that influence the likelihood that nonprofit organizations develop formal types of collaborative activities vis-à-vis informal types. Based on the survey data of 95 urban charitable organizations, the study has found that an organization is more likely to increase th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
416
3
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
416
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In some instances, this can be a good thing for organisational performance; budget constraints have been a direct catalyst for sharing public service provision or public policy problem-solving (Guo and Acar 2005). However, normally, budget pressures deter making information and decision-making more open because public managers fear a loss of autonomy, coordination costs, reduced accountability, and management complexity (Ganapati and Reddick 2014;O'Leary and Bingham 2007;Provan and Lemaire 2012).…”
Section: Budget Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some instances, this can be a good thing for organisational performance; budget constraints have been a direct catalyst for sharing public service provision or public policy problem-solving (Guo and Acar 2005). However, normally, budget pressures deter making information and decision-making more open because public managers fear a loss of autonomy, coordination costs, reduced accountability, and management complexity (Ganapati and Reddick 2014;O'Leary and Bingham 2007;Provan and Lemaire 2012).…”
Section: Budget Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done by establishing collaboration between one institution with another. Collaboration helps in eliminating duplication of function and subsequently reduce costs (Guo & Acar, 2005). Waqf institutions can collaborate with the institutions who have the same objectives or having the resources that they can share and utilize.…”
Section: Development Of Performance Measurement Model For Waqf Institmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network denotes how well an organization manages its relationship with other parties and forms a reputation for trustworthiness and excellence within the network (Lee & Nowell, 2015). This includes collaborating with other organizations which helps to reduce cost and duplication of efforts (Guo & Acar, 2005).…”
Section: Performance Measurement Of Waqf Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, large organizations, which employ more people than small companies and have greater competitive strength in sales or market share, are likely to be more powerful than small organizations (Aldrich, 1976). Guo and Acar (2005) argue that larger organizations with sufficient resources, as indicated by their larger size and annual budget, are less inclined to cooperate. Skinner, Donnelly and Ivancevich (1987) argue that in networks of manufacturers and dealers, the manufacturers are more dependent on dealers to distribute their products when they are larger resellers.…”
Section: Dependence On Key Companiesmentioning
confidence: 99%