2014
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4309-3.ch008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Collections and Their Implicit Structures through Information Visualization

Abstract: This chapter discusses how various approaches to information visualization can be used to assist users in understanding large digital collections and discovering relationships among the entities involved explicitly or implicitly in their development including people, organizations, and documents. Our main postulate is that visualization schemes, such as fisheye views, starfield displays, or self-organizing maps, when integrated and coupled with semantic layouts of topic areas, can significantly facilitate the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Majorities still agreed to benefit and preference, but complexity of some external visual representation approaches (such as timelines, star-field plots, and tree graphs) remained an important limitation to more widespread acceptability, making the formats comparatively more difficult to learn. [72][73][74] Our Meds timeline, which showed the most significant overall performance benefit, was also affected by the lower perceived learnability and higher difficulty compared to simpler formats. In comments, many remarked that more complex designs would be additionally useful after a longer learning period, or that the ideas were a helpful new paradigm, but would take getting used to (►Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majorities still agreed to benefit and preference, but complexity of some external visual representation approaches (such as timelines, star-field plots, and tree graphs) remained an important limitation to more widespread acceptability, making the formats comparatively more difficult to learn. [72][73][74] Our Meds timeline, which showed the most significant overall performance benefit, was also affected by the lower perceived learnability and higher difficulty compared to simpler formats. In comments, many remarked that more complex designs would be additionally useful after a longer learning period, or that the ideas were a helpful new paradigm, but would take getting used to (►Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%