To The Editor, In recent years, sex trafficking has been recognised as a human rights, child welfare and public health priority. The most commonly identified form in the US paediatric population has been termed domestic minor sex trafficking (DMST). DMST is defined as the exchange of a sex act for anything of value involving an American citizen or legal resident under 18 years of age within the borders of the United States (Greeson et al., 2019). Prominent international agreements, such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, have explicitly advocated that minors involved in sex trafficking are considered survivors of crime and warrant specialised support services (Josenhans et al., 2020). Given the associated safety concerns and medicolegal implications, there has, to date, been an understandable emphasis on screening and identification within the healthcare system. However, generalisable aftercare guidelines on specific interventions should a youth screen positive remain elusive. Correspondingly, research has illuminated that only a minority of healthcare providers feel informed about the appropriate clinical response after encountering a trafficking victim (Einbond et al., 2020). Presently, no 'one size fits all' model of healthcare delivery for sex-trafficked youth has been ascertained. Nonetheless, clinical experience and a growing literature base have started to reveal recurring themes of which practices maximise opportunities for youth 'buy-in'. While it has become clear that the needs of trafficked youth are unique, as are the approaches required to address them, the tools necessary to secure a meaningful therapeutic alliance do not warrant a revolution but rather a thoughtful evolution in clinical practice.Although sex-trafficked youth constitute a largely heterogenous population, studies have consistently demonstrated that affected persons disproportionally come from historically marginalised communities, and often have personal experience with various forms of maltreatment (McCoy, 2019). While screening tools typically qualify these realities as biopsychosocial vulnerabilities linked to an individual, social-ecological research has determined that involvement in trafficking is inherently difficult to extricate from poverty, household dysfunction, and systematic oppression based on race, gender identity and sexual orientation (Judge, 2018). As can be seen with other disenfranchised groups, distrust of social services organisations and authority figures is not uncommon. For many youths, the very systems that society might lean on for child protection (e.g. child welfare and law enforcement), may be perceived as a threata threat to criminalise their current support networks and return them to the environments that may have contributed to their involvement in the sex industry in the first place (Gezinski, 2021). Consequently, it is not surprising that trafficked youth frequently voice fears related to the healthcare system given their concerns about confidentiality and mandated report...