Understanding consumer and clinician preferences and decision making for rehabilitation following arthroplasty in the private sector

Abstract

BackgroundTo understand private consumer and clinician preferences towards different rehabilitation modes following knee or hip arthroplasty, and identify factors which influence the chosen rehabilitation pathway.MethodsMixed methods cross-sectional study involving 95 semi-structured interviews of consumers (patients and carers) and clinicians (arthroplasty surgeons, physiotherapists and rehabilitation physicians) in Sydney, Australia, during 2014–2015. Participants were asked about the acceptability of different modes of rehabilitation provision, and factors influencing their chosen rehabilitation pathway. Interviews were in person or via the telephone. Qualitative analysis software was used to electronically manage qualitative data. An analytical approach guided data analysis.ResultsPre-operative preferences strongly influenced the type of rehabilitation chosen by consumers. Key factors that influenced this were both intrinsic and extrinsic, including; the previous experience of self or known others, the perceived benefits of the chosen mode, a sense of entitlement, the role of orthopaedic surgeons and influence of patient preference, a patient’s clinical status post-surgery, the private hospital business model and insurance provider involvement. The acceptability of rehabilitation modes varied between clinician groups.ConclusionsNo one rehabilitation mode provided following arthroplasty is singularly preferred by stakeholders. Factors other than the belief that a particular mode was more effective than another appear to dominate the pathway followed by private arthroplasty consumers, indicating evidence-based policies around rehabilitation provision may have limited appeal in the private sector.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2379-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Exploring patient acceptability of a short‐stay care pathway in hospital post arthroplasty: A theory‐informed qualitative study

“…At least one participant in our sample strongly believed that recovery at home was unsafe and that inpatient rehabilitation would aid their recovery. In an Australian study exploring the acceptability of different modes of rehabilitation, Buhagiar et al 31 also found that positive past experiences and beliefs about level of support influenced patients' rehabilitation preferences. Preoperative screening of patients' beliefs and expectations about in‐hospital versus at‐home recovery may identify patients for whom a short‐stay care pathway may be unsuitable.…”

Understanding factors affecting 30-day unplanned readmissions for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA): the ACT Transition from Hospital to Home Orthopaedics Survey

“…However, a range of patient and provider-based factors have been recognised as affecting the rehabilitation pathway chosen by patients, such as preoperative preferences, previous experiences, perceived benefits, clinical status post-surgery, as well as insurance provider and hospital business model. 51 This association needs clarification.…”

Patient factors associated with referral to inpatient rehabilitation following knee or hip arthroplasty in a public sector cohort: A prognostic factor study

“…Private patients are free to choose this pathway, whilst public patients are not. Previous research suggests choice in the private sector is influenced by several factors including the patient's perceived efficacy of the pathway and their sense of entitlement owing to their private health insurance, as well as by surgeon preference and site‐specific (hospital/clinician) behaviours or factors 17,27 . Investigating referral to inpatient rehabilitation using privately insured cohorts, therefore, is confounded by patient preference 23,28 .…”