2009
DOI: 10.4103/0972-6748.57851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding delusions

Abstract: Delusion has always been a central topic for psychiatric research with regard to etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and forensic relevance. The various theories and explanations for delusion formation are reviewed. The etiology, classification and management of delusions are briefly discussed. Recent advances in the field are reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delusions were characterised according to their content and following accepted criteria (Kiran and Chaudhury, 2009). Persecutory delusions were the most common and were present in 63% of all affected patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delusions were characterised according to their content and following accepted criteria (Kiran and Chaudhury, 2009). Persecutory delusions were the most common and were present in 63% of all affected patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaudhury and Kiran nicely summarize this historical approach to this classification issue, and provide the proposition that "an intellectual sleight of hand is often in operation in the distinction of overvalued and delusion-like. If we intend to make a 'psychotic' diagnosis, then the belief is delusion-like; if we intend to make a 'non-psychotic' diagnosis, then the belief is overvalued" (Chaudhury and Kiran 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kretschmer’s main purpose was to identify particular patterns that could eventually lead to delusional states. Kretschmer can be recognized as a pioneer, introducing the concept of “multidimensional psychiatry”, taking into account biological and biographical factors [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%