2018
DOI: 10.11114/ijsss.v7i1.3747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Differences between CORE and CACREP Counselors-in-Training Perceptions of Self-Efficacy

Abstract: An examination of differences in perceptions of self-efficacy between students in CORE-accredited rehabilitation counseling programs and students in CACREP -accredited clinical mental health counseling programs enrolled in practicum/internship classes is absent in the literature. Results indicated there was not a significant difference (p = .05) between the total self-efficacy scores between both treatment groups (CORE and CACREP). Further, there was not a significant difference between helping skills, session… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the significance of Black women specializing in rehabilitation as counselor educators, this research provides an insight into the historical context of rehabilitation counseling. The Smith Hughes Act of 1917 established a federal board of vocational education and state and federal agencies, while the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1954 focused on allocating funding for graduate‐level rehabilitation counseling training programs (Chan et al., 2004; Harris, 2016; Parker et al., 2005). Thus, the Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE) was formed and subsequently incorporated in 1972 by the American Rehabilitation Counselor Association (ARCA) and the National Rehabilitation Association to define the scope of practice, roles, and responsibilities; facilitate the provision of effective rehabilitation services to persons with disabilities; conduct a quality review of master's level rehabilitation counseling education programs; and assess the competency of rehabilitation counselors (CORE, 2014; Harris, 2016; Leahy & Szymanski, 1995; Stebnicki, 2008; Sweeney, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the significance of Black women specializing in rehabilitation as counselor educators, this research provides an insight into the historical context of rehabilitation counseling. The Smith Hughes Act of 1917 established a federal board of vocational education and state and federal agencies, while the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1954 focused on allocating funding for graduate‐level rehabilitation counseling training programs (Chan et al., 2004; Harris, 2016; Parker et al., 2005). Thus, the Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE) was formed and subsequently incorporated in 1972 by the American Rehabilitation Counselor Association (ARCA) and the National Rehabilitation Association to define the scope of practice, roles, and responsibilities; facilitate the provision of effective rehabilitation services to persons with disabilities; conduct a quality review of master's level rehabilitation counseling education programs; and assess the competency of rehabilitation counselors (CORE, 2014; Harris, 2016; Leahy & Szymanski, 1995; Stebnicki, 2008; Sweeney, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%