2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding divergent trial results of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors for early stage breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CDK4/6 inhibitors affect the progression of tumor cell cycle by inhibiting the enzyme complex (31). They have been used as first-line or second-line treatment in clinical trials for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (32), and researchers have reported the results of their use in early-stage breast cancer (33). Experiments have shown that the application of CDK4/6 inhibitors is related to the improvement of protective immunity (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDK4/6 inhibitors affect the progression of tumor cell cycle by inhibiting the enzyme complex (31). They have been used as first-line or second-line treatment in clinical trials for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (32), and researchers have reported the results of their use in early-stage breast cancer (33). Experiments have shown that the application of CDK4/6 inhibitors is related to the improvement of protective immunity (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6b). Interestingly, the highest efficacy was achieved with abemaciclib (IC 50 467 nM), a Cdk4/Cdk6 inhibitor, which was approved by the FDA in 2017 for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+) and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer [40][41][42] . Also, GSK1059615 (IC 50 1079 nM) and HTH-01-091 (IC 50 1597 nM) showed robust inhibition of HIPK3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ATP-competitive inhibitors target a structurally and functionally similar binding site, poly-pharmacology is often seen and this target promiscuity can lead to both advantageous and detrimental therapeutic consequences 45 . Abemaciclib, reported to be a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor 40 , is a third generation CDK-directed drug with an impressive clinical performance in the treatment of HR+ metastatic breast cancer [41][42][43] . However, it has been suggested early on that abemaciclib may exhibit pan-selective kinase inhibition properties that exceeds those of related CDK4/6 inhibitory drugs as palbociclib and ribociclib 43,46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, including palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib, was a substantive breakthrough in the treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer [ 10 , 11 ]. Palbociclib, approved by FDA in 2015, treated HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as first-line treatment, or combined with fulvestrant in females who have undergone endocrine therapy (AI resistant-disease) [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%