2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.95.044312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding emergent collectivity and clustering in nuclei from a symmetry-based no-core shell-model perspective

Abstract: We present a detailed discussion of the structure of the low-lying positive-parity energy spectrum of 12 C from a no-core shell-model perspective. The approach utilizes a fraction of the usual shellmodel space and extends its multi-shell reach via the symmetry-based no-core symplectic shell model (NCSpM) with a simple, physically-informed effective interaction. We focus on the ground-state rotational band, the Hoyle state and its 2 + and 4 + excitations, as well as the giant monopole 0 + resonance, which is a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we were able to confirm earlier NLEFT results concerning the structure of the Hoyle state and the second 2 + state [21]. For the Hoyle state, prolate α cluster configurations are very important [33], and the second 2 + state is consistent with the interpretation as a rotational excitation of the Hoyle state. Our results provide confirmation that 12 C sits at a fascinating balance point where the competition between the shell structure and clustering Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In particular, we were able to confirm earlier NLEFT results concerning the structure of the Hoyle state and the second 2 + state [21]. For the Hoyle state, prolate α cluster configurations are very important [33], and the second 2 + state is consistent with the interpretation as a rotational excitation of the Hoyle state. Our results provide confirmation that 12 C sits at a fascinating balance point where the competition between the shell structure and clustering Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The symmetry-adapted no-core shell model overcomes the problem of efficiently describing clustering by making use of exact and dynamical symmetries of the spherical harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian associated with collective mode excitations (Draayer et al, 2011;Dreyfuss et al, 2016Dreyfuss et al, , 2013Dytrych et al, 2013Dytrych et al, , 2007. We can rewrite the single-particle spherical harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian in terms of the usual ladder operators,…”
Section: No-core Shell Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…α widths and α-capture reactions of intermediate-mass nuclei are now feasible in the ab initio SA framework, including intermediate-mass nuclei along the path of XRB nucleosynthesis. In general, the formalism is applicable up through the medium-mass region with the ab initio SA-NCSM as well as for heavier nuclei, for instance, when nuclear fragments are described in the no-core symplectic shell model (NCSpM) with effective many-nucleon interaction (115)(116)(117)(118). The NCSpM can reach ultralarge model spaces and has achieved successful microscopic descriptions of low-lying states in deformed A = 8-24 nuclei (117), particularly the elusive Hoyle state in 12 C and its first 2 + and 4 + excitations (116).…”
Section: α-Induced Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%