2017
DOI: 10.18060/21155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Everyday Relationship Work: The Development of a Relationship Maintenance Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further interrogate the impact of sexuality on relationship experience in our crossnational survey of long-term couple relationships, we devised scales of relationship quality and relationship maintenance (see Chonody, Gabb, Killian, & Dunk-West, 2018;Chonody, Killian, Gabb, & Dunk-West, 2016). Here we analyze findings from these scales alongside data from survey questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To further interrogate the impact of sexuality on relationship experience in our crossnational survey of long-term couple relationships, we devised scales of relationship quality and relationship maintenance (see Chonody, Gabb, Killian, & Dunk-West, 2018;Chonody, Killian, Gabb, & Dunk-West, 2016). Here we analyze findings from these scales alongside data from survey questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus important to assess the degree to which these behaviors are occurring and the impacts these have on relationship quality. We therefore created a strengths-based scale that assesses the behaviors of relationship maintenance utilizing the steps described above for the RQ scale (see Chonody et al, 2016). This Relationship Maintenance Scale (RMS) was developed to measure everyday, routine behaviors that occur in relationships.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mean summary ranging from 1 to 5 was constructed, with higher scores reflecting more openness in the relationship. This Openness scale has been found to have good reliability (α = .82–.84) (Baptist, Norton, Aducci, Thompson, & Cook, ) and convergent construct validity with greater happiness (Chonody, Killian, Gabb, & Dunk‐West, ). The Cronbach's alpha for this study demonstrated the scale's reliability (Black partners = .88; White partners = .92).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore developed a new parsimonious relationship maintenance (RM) scale to measure behaviors that occur within a relationship and which help sustain it (Chonody et al, 2017). After assessing item performance alongside skew and kurtosis, the original sample (N = 8,132) was then randomly split into two samples in order to perform the psychometric tests (see Chonody et al, 2017).…”
Section: Relationship Maintenance (Rm) Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, how "relationship" is defined is changing and includes couples that live apart, cohabitators, and non-monogamous partnerships. However, the inclusion of diverse coupledoms, such as domestic partners, and diversity in sexual orientation and race/ethnicity are largely absent from the literature (Chonody, Killian, Gabb, & Dunk-West, 2017). This paper aims to redress this lacuna and focus on relationship maintenance in long-term relationships in later adulthood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%