2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2005.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding existential authenticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
330
0
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 538 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
330
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…As a key concept of occidental thought for many centuries (Steiner & Reisinger, 2006) authenticity became a central subject in tourism research during the 1960s. Since then, the dichotomy of 'the authentic' (as desirable and good) and 'the inauthentic' (as objectionable and corrupt) in tourist settings has dominated not only the intellectual and feuilletonistic discourse, but also a good part of the scientific debate.…”
Section: Authenticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a key concept of occidental thought for many centuries (Steiner & Reisinger, 2006) authenticity became a central subject in tourism research during the 1960s. Since then, the dichotomy of 'the authentic' (as desirable and good) and 'the inauthentic' (as objectionable and corrupt) in tourist settings has dominated not only the intellectual and feuilletonistic discourse, but also a good part of the scientific debate.…”
Section: Authenticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the discussion failed to lead to a broad consensus, which would make authenticity the anchor of a general paradigm for the study of modern tourism, but instead resulted in diverse theoretical perspectives (Rickly-Boyd, 2012). The three types of authenticity distinguished by Wang (1999;2000), objective (object) authenticity (further discussed by Reisinger & Steiner, 2006;Lau, 2010), constructed authenticity (Cohen, 1988;Olsen, 2002) and existential (subjective) authenticity (Steiner & Reisinger, 2006a) are still engendering separate discourses, despite some efforts at bridging them (e.g. Rickly-Boyd, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wide-ranging discussion following MacCannell"s opening, the concept has been interpreted and re-interpreted in various ways with regard to such issues as the nature of authenticity, its construction and experience (e.g. Cohen, 1988;2007a;Crang, 1996;Olsen, 2002;Bruner, 2005;Reisinger & Steiner, 2006;Steiner & Reisinger, 2006a;Belhassen, Caton & Stewart, 2008;Buchmann, Moore, & Fisher, 2010;Knudsen & Waade, 2010;Lau, 2010;Rickly-Boyd, 2012). However, the discussion failed to lead to a broad consensus, which would make authenticity the anchor of a general paradigm for the study of modern tourism, but instead resulted in diverse theoretical perspectives (Rickly-Boyd, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Steiner and Reisinger (2006), Reisinger and Steiner (2006), and earlier Bruner (1991), even suggest abandoning the concept of object authenticity altogether as it has proven to be impossible to agree on meanings, although Lau (2010) in contrast suggests conceptualising authenticity solely as object authenticity, thereby delinking the concept from tourist experiences. However, consistent with the views of Bruner, Reisinger, Steiner, Wang and Selwyn, this paper focuses on the more existential forms of authenticity rather than on object authenticity.…”
Section: Experiential Authenticity and Farm-based Attractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Steiner and Reisinger (2006) argue that authenticity is a muddled concept in which we can understand the term either as applying to the genuineness, or realness of artefacts, involving object authenticity, or instead as an ability to know oneself and to live in accord with oneself free from constraints, which Wang (1999) describes as "existential authenticity", and Selwyn (1996) as "hot" authenticity", or authenticity as feeling, rather than knowledge.…”
Section: Experiential Authenticity and Farm-based Attractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%