Facial aging is caused by various factors. Radiation exposure, gravity, smoking, and hormonal changes lead to structural changes, including decreased skin elasticity, subcutaneous fat malposition, muscle aging, retention of ligament attenuation, and bone changes, leading to facial aging. 1,2 In the modern clinical setting, relatively noninvasive procedures, such as carbon dioxide laser resurfacing, and other invasive procedures, including face-lift surgery, are used to treat facial aging. 3 Traditionally, the face-lift technique involves stretching the loose facial skin. However, this technique was limited in terms of producing longlasting surgical results. In 1974, Skoog proposed a method of relocating subcutaneous fat and platysma muscles to improve facial aging by manipulating all of the soft tissue and skin. 4 Subsequently, Mitz and Peyronie introduced the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), and various surgical methods that enable SMAS manipulation, such as SMAS plication and SMASectomy, Background: Most face-lift techniques greatly improve the lower face; however, techniques for lifting the midface are limited and difficult. Original deep-plane face lift is a way to lift the superficial musculoaponeurotic system and skin as a compound unit. Although it minimizes tear of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system during dissection, damage to the vascular system, and the incidence of skin necrosis, and can be easily used in secondary cases, the deep-plane face lift does not adequately improve nasolabial fold. The authors perform a modified and enhanced deep-plane face lift to improve the midface. In this article, the authors explain the effects and procedures of the method. Methods: This retrospective study included patients (n = 632) on whom deepplane face lift (DPF group; n = 299) and modified deep-plane face lift (M-DPF group; n = 333) was performed by a single surgeon from January of 2014 to January of 2017, and from February of 2017 to December of 2020, respectively, at a local clinic. The degree of improvement in wrinkles in the patients' nasolabial fold was assessed using the five-grade Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). Results: The preoperative WSRS score was 2.95 ± 0.89 in the DPF group and 2.89 ± 0.92 in the M-DPF group. There was no significant difference in the preoperative WSRS score between the two groups (P = 0.058). The postoperative WSRS score was 1.81 ± 0.68 in the DPF group, which was significantly greater than the 1.65 ± 0.66 found in the M-DPF group. Conclusion: This method developed by the authors that combines deep-plane face lift with deep fat compartment mobilization and zygomaticus major muscle plication is safe and directly improves the nasolabial fold and promotes a smiling expression for rejuvenation effects.