2024
DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1350294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding gender inequity in brain health outcomes: missed stroke as a case study for intersectionality

Suze G. Berkhout,
Syeda Hashmi,
Aleksandra Pikula

Abstract: Recent attention into sex and gender-based inequities surrounding outcomes for brain health disorders has generated momentum toward addressing what has been called the “brain health gap.” Importantly though, “women” are not uniform demographic group. In this perspective piece, we discuss misdiagnosis in stroke as an aspect of access and quality of care within brain health. Drawing on narrative data from a mixed methods study of young stroke survivors we suggest that while missed stroke isn't only an issue of g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, enhancing HCPs' knowledge and understanding, directly from the patients' perspective of their health status, gender differences, and novel ideas for targeting post-stroke care interventions in a manner using PROMs (Reeves et al, 2018). Second, the importance of integrating an intersectionality framework in the development of needs, gender and age-specific post-stroke education and interventions appreciating how social identity may influence access, navigation, affordance, and biases; all of which may contribute to stroke outcomes (Berkhout et al, 2024). For example, their personal (e.g., parenting, driving, self-identity, social participation) and professional (e.g., RTW, career growth and development) life Third, the development of non-pharmacological and peer support interventions for the non-physical aspects of stroke (e.g., selfidentity, emotions, role, social participation) based on key goals of this patient population (e.g., RTW, remaining active in social and family lives, maintaining a career) (Sasikumar and Pikula, 2018).…”
Section: Care Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, enhancing HCPs' knowledge and understanding, directly from the patients' perspective of their health status, gender differences, and novel ideas for targeting post-stroke care interventions in a manner using PROMs (Reeves et al, 2018). Second, the importance of integrating an intersectionality framework in the development of needs, gender and age-specific post-stroke education and interventions appreciating how social identity may influence access, navigation, affordance, and biases; all of which may contribute to stroke outcomes (Berkhout et al, 2024). For example, their personal (e.g., parenting, driving, self-identity, social participation) and professional (e.g., RTW, career growth and development) life Third, the development of non-pharmacological and peer support interventions for the non-physical aspects of stroke (e.g., selfidentity, emotions, role, social participation) based on key goals of this patient population (e.g., RTW, remaining active in social and family lives, maintaining a career) (Sasikumar and Pikula, 2018).…”
Section: Care Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%