2nd European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1049/ic.2007.1475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding geometrically based multiple bounce channel models

Abstract: This paper looks into various ways of extending a Geometrically Based Single Bounce Channel Model into a Multiple Bounce one, the main motivation being to overcome some of the limitations of the former models. Three different strategies to implement the way rays are bounced are described and compared, a comparison between diffuse scattering and specular reflection being also investigated; as expected, specular reflection leads to higher power values for the arriving rays, with impact on the delay spread. Some … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our model, we assume that only one reflected version of signal is received in base nodes. This assumption is typically fair in urban areas [20]. As the power of multiple bounces signals (multiple reflected version of main signal) is comparable to that of single bounce signal, The measurement error of DOA is a zero mean independent Gaussian random variable with variance 2   .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our model, we assume that only one reflected version of signal is received in base nodes. This assumption is typically fair in urban areas [20]. As the power of multiple bounces signals (multiple reflected version of main signal) is comparable to that of single bounce signal, The measurement error of DOA is a zero mean independent Gaussian random variable with variance 2   .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we reasonably assume that signals that go through multiple bounces are weaker than single bounce signals; thus, they are ignorable. This assumption is typically fare for urban areas [80]. Practically, we can design our receiver such that it only considers signals received with power larger than a specific threshold for this problem.…”
Section: System Model and Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%