2020 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps47924.2020.00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding GPU-Based Lossy Compression for Extreme-Scale Cosmological Simulations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare cuSZ with cuZFP in terms of the kernel performance and the overall performance that includes the GPU-to-CPU communication cost. Note that the performance of cuZFP is highly related to its userset fixed bitrate according to the previous study [39] Throughput ( / ) performance of cuSZ is hardly affected by the user-set error bound. Therefore, we choose the acceptable fixed bitrate for cuZFP, which generates data distortion (i.e., PSNR of about 85 dB) similar to that of cuSZ, as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Compression Performancementioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compare cuSZ with cuZFP in terms of the kernel performance and the overall performance that includes the GPU-to-CPU communication cost. Note that the performance of cuZFP is highly related to its userset fixed bitrate according to the previous study [39] Throughput ( / ) performance of cuSZ is hardly affected by the user-set error bound. Therefore, we choose the acceptable fixed bitrate for cuZFP, which generates data distortion (i.e., PSNR of about 85 dB) similar to that of cuSZ, as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Compression Performancementioning
confidence: 61%
“…can be applied to decompression, as mentioned in §3.3. Here we argue that the compression throughput is more important than the decompression throughput, because users use the CPU-SZ mainly to decompress the data for postanalysis and visualization instead of the GPU after the compressed data is transferred and stored to parallel file systems [11,39]. We note that cuSZ on the CESM-ATM dataset exhibits much lower performance than on other datasets.…”
Section: Compression Performancementioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, using the new generation of error-bounded lossy compression techniques, such as SZ [9,22,34] and ZFP [23], we can achieve much higher compression ratios with minimal distortion of the data as demonstrated in many prior studies [4, 9, 16, 21-23, 26, 28, 34, 35]. However, previous approaches of utilizing lossy compression for scientific datasets have always applied the same compression configuration to the entire dataset [21,33]. Yet, if we look at a visualization of baryon density in a Nyx simulation, shown in Figure 1, we can see that not all partitions (regions) have the same amount of information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apart from fine-grained adaptive compression, we must also be able to precisely control the compression error for domain-specific post-hoc analysis. Research has shown that general-purpose data distortion metrics, such as peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), normalized root-mean-square error, mean relative error (MRE), and mean square error (MSE), on their own cannot satisfy the demand of quality for cosmological simulation post-hoc analysis [16,21]. For example, PSNR does not tell us how the mass of a halo would be impacted after compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%