Understanding housing policy (third edition)

Lund, Brian

doi:10.2307/j.ctt1t89dc6

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For most of the last century, private renting in the UK was in decline. Its role in housing those in poverty became very marginal as the UK developed a substantial social rented sector with a strong welfare focus [13] [14] [15] [16]. The term 'social rented sector' covers a range of organisations providing rental housing at below-market rents, usually relying in part on provider subsidies from national government which also regulate their activities to a high degree.…”

Section: Poverty and The Prsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Poverty and the re-growth of private renting in the UK, 1994-2018

Bailey

2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last two decades, private renting has undergone a major revival in the UK, more than doubling its share within the housing system. Young adults increasingly remain in the sector into their 30s, giving rise to the term 'Generation Rent'. Using data from the UK's Family Resources Survey, this article shows how reliance on the sector varies by poverty status, particularly for young adults and children. In 2017/18, 42 per cent of adults under 40 in low-income poverty lived in private renting, compared with just 26 per cent of non-poor. This is almost double the proportion of 20 years earlier. Private renting is now home to more poor adults under 40 than owner occupation and social renting combined. In addition, one in three children in poverty (36 per cent) now lives in private renting, three times the level of 20 years ago. For both adults and children, rates are even higher in London and the South. Although rates of increase have slowed in recent years, this dramatic shift in the housing circumstances of those in poverty has a number of implications for housing and social policy which have not yet been sufficiently recognised.

show abstract

Section: Poverty and The Prsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Poverty and the re-growth of private renting in the UK, 1994-2018

Bailey

2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kai kurių autorių teigimu, tai taip pat ir valstybės veikla, kurios tikslasreguliuoti rinką būsto sektoriuje ir patį būsto sektorių (Lund 2011). Paminėtina ir tai, kad tai taip pat ir "tinkamo ir prieinamo būsto teisė yra visų žmonių socialinė garantija, kuri yra užtikrinama Europos būsto chartijos, taip pat ji pabrėžia Europos Sąjungos valstybių narių susidūrimą su nekilnojamo būsto rinkos, benamystės problemomis, skatinanti būsto integraciją į ekonominę, teritorinę sanglaudos ir socialinę politiką" (Mockienė 2009).…”

Section: Būsto Politika Skirtingų Gerovės Valstybės Modelių Konteksteunclassified

Jaunimo apsirūpinimas būstu: galimybės ir problemos

Brazienė¹

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ĮvadasVienas iš jaunų asmenų tapimo suaugusiuoju atributų yra savarankiškas nuo tėvų ar globėjų gyvenimas. Pasauliniu mastu pastebima tendencija, kad jaunimo perėjimas į nepriklausomą bei savarankišką suaugusiųjų gyvenimą sudėtingėja, jaunimas vis vėliau palieka tėvų namus, įsigyja ar nuomojasi nuosavą būstą bei tampa savarankiški. Pažymėtina ir tai, kad nuosavo būsto prieinamumas / įsigijimas tampa vis aktualesne problema 132 KULTŪRA IR VISUOMENĖ. Socialinių tyrimų žurnalas 2018 9 (2)

show abstract

“…Moreover, because relief was given on nominal interest payments, the effective extent of this tax relief rose with inflation, further lowering the user cost (Feldstein, 1999). As to the market effects of MIRAS, Lund (2011) claimed that it was unfair since it gave more assistance to high-rate taxpayers and those with the largest mortgages and that it artificially stimulated house prices by encouraging people to consume more accommodation than they actually required. Similarly, Balchin and Rhoden (2006) mentioned that MIRAS failed to help the low-income people since it pushed up demand and thus house prices beyond their means.…”

Section: The 1970smentioning

confidence: 99%

Housing cycles in the UK: a historical and empirical investigation

Pitros

Arayıcı

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.*Related content and download information correct at time of download. Housing cycles in the UK: a historical and empirical investigation Charalambos PitrosSchool of the Built Environment, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK, and Yusuf ArayiciCivil Engineering Department, Hasan Kalyoncu Universitesi, Gaziantep, Turkey Abstract Purpose -The study looks at the characteristics of upswings and downswings for UK housing cycles. Specifically, the purpose of this paper is to empirically analyse cycles in house prices and housing affordability on the characteristics of persistence, magnitude and severity. Design/methodology/approach -The paper draws upon the triangular methodology of cycles and utilises housing data from the last three decades. Findings -From an empirical perspective, the study obtained four main results. First, the graphical trajectory of cycles in house price and housing affordability is highly synchronized. Second, upturns in both cycles tend to be longer than downturns on average. Third, the recent upturn in house prices and housing affordability is characterised by larger duration, magnitude and severity than the earlier case. Fourth, the latest downturn in both cycles is highly synchronised in terms of time occurrence, persistence, magnitude and severity; in addition, in both cases, the latest downturn is considerably smaller than the previous one. The study additionally indicates that on average the length of a complete house price and housing affordability cycle is 19 years on a peak-to-peak basis.Research limitations/implications -This paper is essentially exploratory and raises a number of questions for further investigation. Future research should, first, arrive at a more nuanced definition of affordability and, second, examine causality. The fact that two phenomena appear to have some significant synchronicity is not an indication that they are interdependent, although logic would suggest they might be. Originality/value -This is among the few papers that analyses cycles in UK house prices. It is the first study that draws attention to the housing affordability cycle and the first to compare cycles in house prices with cycles in housing affordability.

show abstract

Understanding housing policy (third edition)

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Poverty and the re-growth of private renting in the UK, 1994-2018

Poverty and the re-growth of private renting in the UK, 1994-2018

Jaunimo apsirūpinimas būstu: galimybės ir problemos

Housing cycles in the UK: a historical and empirical investigation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About