2021
DOI: 10.1108/itse-01-2021-0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding how embedded peer comments affect student quiz scores, academic writing and lecture note-taking accuracy

Abstract: Purpose This study aims to better understand the relationship between peer feedback in the context of online collaborative note-taking and how comments impacted student performance and understanding. Design/methodology/approach This one sample investigation was of graduate students participating in an academic writing class working collaboratively online. Data was gathered on student feedback during note-taking activity to test for its effects on student performance and understanding. Findings The use of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings indicate that students who receive more comments will write better papers, which coincides with evidence suggesting that students may improve their writing performance after receiving comments from their peers in the learning process ( Ebadi and Rahimi, 2017 ; Huisman et al., 2018 , 2019 ; Shvidko, 2015 ; Zhang et al., 2021 ). Students may improve their work based on the feedback they received, which identifies their writing's strengths and faults ( Casey and Goodyear, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The findings indicate that students who receive more comments will write better papers, which coincides with evidence suggesting that students may improve their writing performance after receiving comments from their peers in the learning process ( Ebadi and Rahimi, 2017 ; Huisman et al., 2018 , 2019 ; Shvidko, 2015 ; Zhang et al., 2021 ). Students may improve their work based on the feedback they received, which identifies their writing's strengths and faults ( Casey and Goodyear, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These two methods provide students an opportunity to discuss ideas and questions, review, criticize, and edit each other's work by adding suggestions and responding to them ( Lin and Reigeluth, 2016 ; Zhu and Carless, 2018 ), which activate key cognitive processes. Existing evidence supports the claim that peer feedback may improve students' academic writing performance ( Ebadi and Rahimi, 2017 ; Huisman et al., 2018 , 2019 ; Zhang et al., 2021 ). However, there is a lack of clarity regarding how giving and receiving comments and edits will affect students' writing performance separately, especially in an online collaborative context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Brown (1992); Plakans et al (2019) state that writing can be used to create and sustain contact with others, communicate information, express feelings and emotions, entertain, and persuade as a mode of communication. As a result, EFL teachers should provide plenty of opportunities for students to practice writing in English during the teaching and learning process (Zhang et al, 2021;Haerazi et al, 2021). They should be an example of English and should be able to select resources and present them in a manner that achieves the instruction's goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%