2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-012-9334-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding How Families Use Magnifiers During Nature Center Walks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific prior experiences were coded based on the identified settings for science learning (see Table ): Everyday experiences : This category includes routine activities that interest the families, such as hobbies, vacations, or unplanned, spontaneous time with immediate and extended family (Bell et al., ). Designed spaces : The National Research Council defines “designed spaces” as museums, science centers, aquariums, and zoos (Bell et al., ) as commonly visited spaces for informal science learning. We also consider playgrounds and parks to be designed spaces, given that our study's setting was an outdoor site. Programs for science learning : Science programs include mentor programs, clubs, scouting organizations, summer camps, and educational programs, such as community lectures (Bell et al., ). Science and other media : Science media includes digital media, such as television shows, the Internet, and content accessed by mobile devices, all of which have been identified as influential modes for learning both about science (Bell et al., ; Falk & Dierking, ; Falk, Storksdieck, & Dierking, ; Zimmerman et al., ) and the environment (Ballantyne, Packer, & Falk, ; Zimmerman, McClain, & Crowl, ). This category also includes print media, such as books, newspapers, and magazines (Bell et al., ). School : Formal education provides an important opportunity to develop basic science skills (Falk & Dierking, ). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific prior experiences were coded based on the identified settings for science learning (see Table ): Everyday experiences : This category includes routine activities that interest the families, such as hobbies, vacations, or unplanned, spontaneous time with immediate and extended family (Bell et al., ). Designed spaces : The National Research Council defines “designed spaces” as museums, science centers, aquariums, and zoos (Bell et al., ) as commonly visited spaces for informal science learning. We also consider playgrounds and parks to be designed spaces, given that our study's setting was an outdoor site. Programs for science learning : Science programs include mentor programs, clubs, scouting organizations, summer camps, and educational programs, such as community lectures (Bell et al., ). Science and other media : Science media includes digital media, such as television shows, the Internet, and content accessed by mobile devices, all of which have been identified as influential modes for learning both about science (Bell et al., ; Falk & Dierking, ; Falk, Storksdieck, & Dierking, ; Zimmerman et al., ) and the environment (Ballantyne, Packer, & Falk, ; Zimmerman, McClain, & Crowl, ). This category also includes print media, such as books, newspapers, and magazines (Bell et al., ). School : Formal education provides an important opportunity to develop basic science skills (Falk & Dierking, ). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our early research fi ndings (Zimmerman, McClain, & Crowl, 2013 ) suggested that the mobile app supported learners to engage in high levels of describing and naming talk (see perceptual talk Allen, 2002 ) around scientifi c observations; however, learners' conceptual talk that was interpretive and explanatory was less prevalent. Given our focus on ecology, we intended to enhance conceptual thinking and talk around natural cycles (e.g., life cycle, seasonal cycle, water cycle, rock cycle), which led our team to refi ne our Tree Investigators design to support open-ended and conceptually focused activity (Land & Hannafi n, 2000 ;Land, Hannafi n, & Oliver, 2012 ).…”
Section: The Tree Investigators Informal Mobile Learning Environmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Earlier studies have explored topics such as how families use epistemic resources to make sense of science content Zimmerman et al, 2010;, types of learning talk (Allen, 2002), how parents support children's inquiry and scientific reasoning skills (Ash, 2003;Crowley et al, 2001;Kisiel, Rowe, Vartabedian, & Kopczak, 2012), how parents and children interact at live animal exhibits (Geerdts, Van de Walle, & LoBue, 2015; Kopczak, Kisiel, & Rowe, 2015; Patrick & Tunnicliffe, 2013; , and the role of cultural tools and technology in supporting family learning Martell, 2008;Zimmerman, Land, McClain, Mohney, Choi, & Salman, 2015;Zimmerman, McClain, & Crowl, 2013).…”
Section: Learning Conversationsmentioning
confidence: 99%