Understanding Human Error in Naval Aviation Mishaps

Abstract

Objective: To better understand the external factors that influence the performance and decisions of aviators involved in Naval aviation mishaps.Background: Mishaps in complex activities, ranging from aviation to nuclear power operations, are often the result of interactions between multiple components within an organization. The Naval aviation mishap database contains relevant information, both in quantitative statistics and qualitative reports, that permits analysis of such interactions to identify how the working atmosphere influences aviator performance and judgment.Method: Results from 95 severe Naval aviation mishaps that occurred from 2011 through 2016 were analyzed using Bayes' theorem probability formula. Then a content analysis was performed on a subset of relevant mishap reports.Results: Out of the 14 latent factors analyzed, the Bayes' application identified 6 that impacted specific aspects of aviator behavior during mishaps. Technological environment, misperceptions, and mental awareness impacted basic aviation skills. The remaining 3 factors were used to inform a content analysis of the contextual information within mishap reports. Teamwork failures were the result of plan continuation aggravated by diffused responsibility. Resource limitations and risk management deficiencies impacted judgments made by squadron commanders.Conclusion: The application of Bayes' theorem to historical mishap data revealed the role of latent factors within Naval aviation mishaps. Teamwork failures were seen to be considerably damaging to both aviator skill and judgment.Application: Both the methods and findings have direct application for organizations interested in understanding the relationships between external factors and human error. It presents real-world evidence to promote effective safety decisions.

How Just Culture and Personal Goals Moderate the Positive Relation between Commercial Pilots’ Safety Citizenship Behavior and Voluntary Incident Reporting

“…The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), which is based on the Swiss Cheese Model, considers the occurrence of incidents as a linear failure in the areas of organizational influences, unsafe supervision, preconditions, and pilots' unsafe acts [58]. The appropriateness of HFACS for incident report analysis has also been demonstrated in scientific studies [59,60]. In HFACS, pilots' unsafe acts are divided into performance-based errors, judgment and decision-making errors, and violations.…”

21st International Symposium on Aviation Psychology

“…CRM training has emphasized team-related factors such as leadership, climate, communication, and decision-making . Teamwork failures have been identified as major proximal causes of mishaps among both pilot (Miranda, 2018) and ATC teams (Read & Charles, 2018). Although the importance of teamwork in aviation is well-recognized, a comprehensive model of teamwork in aviation is lacking and researchers have expressed the need for a multifactor model of teamwork in aviation (Edwards et al, 2012).…”

Why Learning Opportunities From Aviation Incidents Are Lacking

“…Even though the Swiss cheese model has been criticized for not being able to capture the real world because it is too static and not specified enough, advantages of the system have been repeatedly highlighted in civil, commercial, and military aviation, but also in other organizations such as hospitals (Cohen et al, 2015; Hollnagel et al, 2006; Larouzee & Le Coze, 2020; Sunaryo et al, 2019). HFACS has also emerged as a reliable system in the framework of incident or weak signal analysis (e.g., Lee et al, 2017; Li & Harris, 2006; Madigan et al, 2016; Miranda, 2018; Munene, 2016). Miranda (2017), for example, was able to identify latent failures that are particularly conducive to certain types of unsafe acts when evaluating major accidents in a military context.…”