Understanding Ill-Structured Engineering Ethics Problems Through a Collaborative Learning and Argument Visualization Approach

Abstract

As a committee of the National Academy of Engineering recognized, ethics education should foster the ability of students to analyze complex decision situations and ill-structured problems. Building on the NAE's insights, we report about an innovative teaching approach that has two main features: first, it places the emphasis on deliberation and on self-directed, problem-based learning in small groups of students; and second, it focuses on understanding ill-structured problems. The first innovation is motivated by an abundance of scholarly research that supports the value of deliberative learning practices. The second results from a critique of the traditional case-study approach in engineering ethics. A key problem with standard cases is that they are usually described in such a fashion that renders the ethical problem as being too obvious and simplistic. The practitioner, by contrast, may face problems that are ill-structured. In the collaborative learning environment described here, groups of students use interactive and web-based argument visualization software called "AGORA-net: Participate - Deliberate!". The function of the software is to structure communication and problem solving in small groups. Students are confronted with the task of identifying possible stakeholder positions and reconstructing their legitimacy by constructing justifications for these positions in the form of graphically represented argument maps. The argument maps are then presented in class so that these stakeholder positions and their respective justifications become visible and can be brought into a reasoned dialogue. Argument mapping provides an opportunity for students to collaborate in teams and to develop critical thinking and argumentation skills.

Cooperative learning in Forestry Engineering with NIPPE Descartes software

“…By moving the control points, it can be seen that the velocities are correctly calculated for any position. The use of the software improved problem solving , and the methodology could be enhanced in the future with self‐assessment and online evaluation by peers. This would aid the construction of opinion and forms of expression, peer interaction and participation , and the students’ own oral presentations moderated by teachers.…”

Are Students Blind to Their Ethical Blind Spots? An Exploration of Why Ethics Education Should Focus on Self-Perception Biases

“…In this course, students encountered ethical dilemmas in their projects (including conflicts between teammates, disagreements with clients, stakeholder needs, and communication-related challenges) through a problembased learning (PBL) approach. PBL has been shown to encourage student learning about ethics in management (Lavine & Roussin, 2012), engineering (Chang & Wang, 2011;Hoffmann & Borenstein, 2014), and medicine (N. L. Jones, Peiffer, Lambros, & Eldridge, 2010). Brownell and Jameson (2004) highlight the relationship between PBL and behavioral ethics, noting "PBL helps students to appreciate multiple perspectives, recognize non-rational elements of decision making and confront ethical quandaries" (p. 558).…”

Teaching Ethics to Engineers: A Socratic Experience

“…Besides, the appeal to personal experience is essential for providing a learning resource that helps students understand and retain knowledge (Dewey 1938). The use of the traditional case-study approach in teaching engineering ethics has been criticized on the grounds that standard cases are usually described in such a fashion as to render the ethical problem too obvious and simplistic (Hoffmann and Borenstein 2014). Though this need not always be so (Davis 1997), standard cases can also make the mistake-a common one when teaching ethics-of misrepresenting moral problems as 'dilemmas', that is, as a forced choice between two unacceptable alternatives (Whitbeck 1995).…”