Understanding Local Governance: Institutional Forms of Collaboration

Abstract

The article discusses institutional forms of governance, understanding governance as hybrid forms of collaboration, involving government, market actors and/or civil society actors. By utilizing data from a study made of three Norwegian cities, six collaborative efforts are presented, and discussed in relation to analytical characteristics derived from both network theory and organizational theory. This analysis illustrates that these collaboration efforts can, on the one hand, be understood as something located between networks and organizations. On the other hand, one may argue they belong to none of the two theoretical categories, implying the need for new theories regarding collaboration. These observations are followed by some theoretical reflections about how democratic governments can influence collaborations, and ensure that the common will can actually become real.Asbjørn Røiseland is in the

The efficiency and effectiveness of municipally owned corporations: a systematic review

“…While we have limited this study to discussion of effects of MOCs, there exists a body of literature Gradus, Elbert Dijkgraaf, and Wassenaar 2014;Rodrigues, Tavares, and De Araújo 2012;Røiseland 2011;Tavares and Camões 2007) examining the causes of MOCs. Moreover, we did not discuss (chapters in) books and publications in other sources than peer-reviewed academic journals, which increased our study's reliability at the expense of its sample size.…”

From Fragmentation to Comprehensiveness in Network Governance

“…Goal consensus, joint action and motivation are related to both the degree of factors' agreement about the network's goals and to the strategies implemented to ensure the goals' achievement (Provan and Kenis 2008;Røiseland 2011;Emerson et al 2012 ).…”

Between Government and Governance: Opening the Black Box of the Transformation Thesis

“…For example, Vabo and Røiseland (2012) have-through empirical enquires-demonstrated how classic and generic frameworks analyzing tools of government are still relevant in network context, and therefore argue for a bridge between the classical literature on policy instruments and the growing framework of metagovernance. Røiseland(2011) has also elsewhere, based on studies of collaborative arrangements in local government, demonstrated that the institutional forms of such arrangements do in reality exist in a continuum between the archetypical definitions of government and governance from the literature.…”