2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding low cycle fatigue and creep–fatigue interaction behavior of 316 L(N) stainless steel weld joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical engineering stress-strain curves are illustrated in Figure 9, and the numbers from 1 to 11 in the figure represent the number of the specimens. It could be obviously found that most of the test samples show a tensile strength of about 500 MPa, which was close to that of the substrate material (Shankar et al, 2016). Test sample cut from specimen S10 illustrates the highest tensile strength and the sample cut from S2 and S9 shows the highest elongation.…”
Section: Tensile Results and Fracture Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Typical engineering stress-strain curves are illustrated in Figure 9, and the numbers from 1 to 11 in the figure represent the number of the specimens. It could be obviously found that most of the test samples show a tensile strength of about 500 MPa, which was close to that of the substrate material (Shankar et al, 2016). Test sample cut from specimen S10 illustrates the highest tensile strength and the sample cut from S2 and S9 shows the highest elongation.…”
Section: Tensile Results and Fracture Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This unaccumulated plastic strain balances by forming cavities or new surfaces of cracks in the austenitic matrix in the FZ. 39 Further, the microstructure of fatigue fracture specimens was examined to confirm the failure location at different stress amplitudes. For the specimens tested with 150 MPa and 175 MPa stress amplitude, the failure location was approximately 0.97 mm away from the fusion boundary in the FZ, as illustrated in Figures 8(b) and (c).…”
Section: Failure Location Of Fatigue Test Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of parameters such as the strain rate or strain amplitude have a significant influence on LCF behavior [ 9 , 10 ]. In addition, defects and the near-surface microstructure in particular have a significant influence on LCF fatigue properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%