2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Magnetic Cloud Structure From Shock/Discontinuity Analysis

Abstract: We reexamine the magnetic cloud (MC) event during the period of 21–23 May 2007. In this event, the axis of the MC has a high inclination to the ecliptic plane and the heliospheric current sheet happens to be on the ecliptic plane. Therefore, we can use the feature of zero north‐south component of interplanetary magnetic field to identify the MC boundaries. Inside the MC, there is an enhanced pressure/density region enclosed by two discontinuities. We verified these discontinuities through multiple spacecraft i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the reliability of our scheme in the normal determination, we first reexamine eight Cluster cases in Knetter et al () and compare with their multispacecraft results. We further analyze a few TDs of STEREO B observations presented in Lin et al ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To understand the reliability of our scheme in the normal determination, we first reexamine eight Cluster cases in Knetter et al () and compare with their multispacecraft results. We further analyze a few TDs of STEREO B observations presented in Lin et al ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adopting the error cone idea presented in Lin et al (), the uncertainty of a DD normal estimation in single‐spacecraft measurements is determined by the deviation of magnetic fields from the normal direction, as represented by the angle ϵ. Namely, normalϵ=21Mα=1Msin1Bn()αB()α2, where α = 1, 2, … , M is the index of data points in the period of 2 min before and 2 min after the studied DD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations