2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmate.2023.100137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding melt pool characteristics in laser powder bed fusion: An overview of single- and multi-track melt pools for process optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 193 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the focused laser heating on the powder bed, the L-PBF process bears risks of various defects that are brought about by its instability [184,185]. The formation of spatters, which is an inevitable by-product of the L-PBF process, is the main reason for powder degradation during reuse [186].…”
Section: Powder Degradation During Powder Reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the focused laser heating on the powder bed, the L-PBF process bears risks of various defects that are brought about by its instability [184,185]. The formation of spatters, which is an inevitable by-product of the L-PBF process, is the main reason for powder degradation during reuse [186].…”
Section: Powder Degradation During Powder Reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, Montani et al [22] conducted the pioneering investigation into the feasibility of pure Zn prepared by LPBF and observed a relative density of only 88% due to its susceptibility to evaporation during rapid solidification caused by its low melting and boiling points, resulting in inadequate densification. Subsequently, numerous works have been dedicated to fabricating highly dense Zn samples through LPBF equipment modification [23], meticulous monitoring of the printing process [24], and optimization of process parameters to mitigate evaporation [25,26]. For instance, Qin et al [27] achieved a relative density exceeding 99% in LPBF-printed pure Zn samples through optimizing gas protection and laser energy input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 The evolution of additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized orthopedic implant production. 28 In comparison to conventional manufacturing techniques, AM presents advantages in personalized customization, the ability to handle intricate geometries and design optimization 29 while also reducing production time and costs. 30 Particularly in the fabrication of porous structures, AM proves notably advantageous, enabling the swift translation of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) files into physical objects with reproducibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%