Understanding Messaging Preferences to Inform Development of Mobile Goal-Directed Behavioral Interventions

Abstract

BackgroundMobile messaging interventions have been shown to improve outcomes across a number of mental health and health-related conditions, but there are still significant gaps in our knowledge of how to construct and deliver the most effective brief messaging interventions. Little is known about the ways in which subtle linguistic variations in message content can affect user receptivity and preferences.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether any global messaging preferences existed for different types of language content, and how certain characteristics moderate those preferences, in an effort to inform the development of mobile messaging interventions.MethodsThis study examined user preferences for messages within 22 content groupings. Groupings were presented online in dyads of short messages that were identical in their subject matter, but structurally or linguistically varied. Participants were 277 individuals residing in the United States who were recruited and compensated through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) system. Participants were instructed to select the message in each dyad that they would prefer to receive to help them achieve a personal goal of their choosing.ResultsResults indicate global preferences of more than 75% of subjects for certain types of messages, such as those that were grammatically correct, free of textese, benefit-oriented, polite, nonaggressive, and directive as opposed to passive, among others. For several classes of messages, few or no clear global preferences were found. There were few personality- and trait-based moderators of message preferences, but subtle manipulations of message structure, such as changing “Try to…” to “You might want to try to…” affected message choice.ConclusionsThe results indicate that individuals are sensitive to variations in the linguistic content of text messages designed to help them achieve a personal goal and, in some cases, have clear preferences for one type of message over another. Global preferences were indicated for messages that contained accurate spelling and grammar, as well as messages that emphasize the positive over the negative. Research implications and a guide for developing short messages for goal-directed behaviors are presented in this paper.

Development of Participant-Informed Text Messages to Promote Physical Activity Among African American Women Attending College: A Qualitative Mixed-Methods Inquiry

“…Results of our study are similar to other studies conducted in younger adolescents and older adults that have shown feasibility and acceptability of text messaging (Muench, Van Stolk-Cooke, Morganstern, Kuerbis, & Markle, 2014) to promote weight loss and/or PA (Gerber et al, 2009; Woolford, Clark, Strecher, & Resnicow, 2010; Woolford et al, 2011). In a study by Woolford and colleagues, young adolescent perspectives on the content of text messages in weight loss promotion were explored.…”

A Depression Prevention Intervention for Adolescents in the Emergency Department

“…(34) Prior literature(12, 35) and our own formative work(9, 10) emphasize the importance of a positive tone and of participant-relevant language in automated interventions. Accordingly, all aspects of iDOVE’s content and structure were iteratively refined prior to this pilot to reflect participants’ own experiences, literacy levels, and definitions of “positive” language, using a human-centric, qualitative approach.…”

Text Message-Based Intervention Targeting Alcohol Consumption Among University Students: Findings From a Formative Development Study

“…Similar to our findings, users preferred messages that highlighted the positive over the negative, were nonaggressive, and benefit-oriented messages. In addition, aspects such as correct spelling and grammar, directive rather than passive approach, and messages without “textese” (eg, abbreviations) were found to be more preferred [31]. …”